Show simple item record

Adoption of Residential Green Building Practices: Understanding the Role of Familiarity.

dc.contributor.authorScheuer, Christopher W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-05T18:51:38Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2007-09-05T18:51:38Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55676
dc.description.abstractConventional homebuilding practices account for significant environmental effects. While green building practices can offset many of these impacts, the extent to which such approaches are used is too small to have a marked effect. Yet increasing the adoption of green homebuilding practices faces major challenges. The current work looks at residential green building in order to understand how familiarity plays a role in the adoption of these practices. This research consists of three studies. The first study uses Kaplan and Kaplan s Reasonable Person Model (RPM) to examine the promotion and adoption of green building practices. The latter two studies focus on the role of familiarity as a particularly salient aspect of the information processing approach. In the second study, interviews with 19 builders in Michigan and 32 in Oregon are used to analyze familiarity with green building. In the third study, a survey of 171 U.S. builders, structural equation modeling is used to test the relationships among sources of information about green building, familiarity, and use of green practices. The results provide strong evidence for the role of familiarity in builders use of green practices. The RPM approach illustrates how informational needs relate to the adoption of green practices. Findings from the interviews show that increased green building experience relates to a shift in familiarity from building and project issues to conceptual and behavioral issues. The structural equation models demonstrate that familiarity strongly relates to the use of green building practices. Furthermore, familiarity is found to mediate various sources of information on the use of green practices. This work leads to several recommendations. Familiarity can be incorporated in the design of communications programs to augment builders receptivity to adopting new practices. Increasing the availability of experiences that develop familiarity may facilitate learning about green building. Finding ways to develop builders familiarity with the system level, rather than building level, dimensions of green building may prove particularly useful for supporting the adoption of more innovative practices. Finally, a broader and longer-term view of the objectives of green building programs may be useful for supporting widespread change in builders practices.en_US
dc.format.extent26 bytes
dc.format.extent675571 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGreen Buildingen_US
dc.subjectFamiliarityen_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.subjectConstruction Innovationen_US
dc.subjectInformation Processingen_US
dc.subjectStructural Equation Modelingen_US
dc.titleAdoption of Residential Green Building Practices: Understanding the Role of Familiarity.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDe Young, Raymond K.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKaplan, Rachelen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKaplan, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPeterson, Christopher M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55676/2/cscheuer_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.