A sensemaking lens on reliability The first three authors contributed equally and listed alphabetically.
dc.contributor.author | Blatt, Ruth | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Christianson, Marlys Kim | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rosenthal, Marilynn M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-09-20T17:44:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-01-03T16:19:57Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2006-11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Blatt, Ruth; Christianson, Marlys K.; Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.; Rosenthal, Marilynn M. (2006). "A sensemaking lens on reliability The first three authors contributed equally and listed alphabetically. ." Journal of Organizational Behavior 27(7): 897-917. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55839> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0894-3796 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1099-1379 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55839 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study assessed the applicability of current theories of reliability in dynamic settings by exploring the sensemaking processes experienced by a sample of medical residents around lapses in reliability of patient care. Important differences in lapses surfaced, particularly with respect to whether actors were aware that a lapse was occurring in real-time and whether there was anything they could do or say to mitigate or prevent the lapse. In over half of the incidents recounted, the actors did not become aware of the lapse in reliability until after the consequence of the lapse had occurred or the consequence occurred simultaneously with the recognition of the lapse. In other incidents, they faced a critical moment in which they had to decide whether and how to act to intervene in real-time. In the majority of these critical moments, residents had an issue of concern to voice that could have helped mitigate or correct the lapse but instead they remained silent. Issues related to identity and relationships appeared to either inhibit or promote voice during critical moments. We end with ideas for how our findings can inform existing work on reliability in healthcare and the growing literature on voice and silence in organizations. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 165167 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychology | en_US |
dc.title | A sensemaking lens on reliability The first three authors contributed equally and listed alphabetically. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Business (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Management & Organizations, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Management & Organizations, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Management & Organizations, Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. ; Ross School of Business, 701 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55839/1/392_ftp.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.392 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Organizational Behavior | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.