Show simple item record

Quality improvement and hospital financial performance

dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Jeffrey A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeiner, Bryan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, John R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T17:44:26Z
dc.date.available2008-01-03T16:20:01Zen_US
dc.date.issued2006-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlexander, Jeffrey A.; Weiner, Bryan J.; Griffith, John (2006). "Quality improvement and hospital financial performance." Journal of Organizational Behavior 27(7): 1003-1029. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55840>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-3796en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1379en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55840
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to examine the association between the scope and intensity of Quality improvement (QI) implementation in hospitals and organizational performance. A sample of 1,784 community hospitals was used to assess relationships between QI implementation approach and two hospital-level performance indicators: cash flow and cost per case. Two-stage instrumental variables estimation, in which predicted values (instruments) of eight QI intensity and scope variables plus control (exogenous) variables were used to estimate hospital-level performance indicators. Our results suggest that QI has a measurable impact on global measures of organizational performance and that both control and leaning approaches to QI matter in these settings. Hospitals that implement QI effectively can reasonably expect to improve their financial and cost performance, or at least not place the hospital at risk for investing in quality improvement. These outcomes are specific to QI strategies that emphasize both control and learning. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent187495 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherPsychologyen_US
dc.titleQuality improvement and hospital financial performanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumHealth Management and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. ; Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumHealth Management and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHealth Policy and Administration, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55840/1/401_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.401en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Organizational Behavioren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.