Show simple item record

Evaluation of semi-quantitative scoring system for metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scans in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma

dc.contributor.authorMessina, Julia A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Su-Chunen_US
dc.contributor.authorFranc, Benjamin L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCharron, Martinen_US
dc.contributor.authorShulkin, Barry L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTo, Baoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaris, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYanik, Gregory A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Randall A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthay, Katherine K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T17:46:17Z
dc.date.available2008-01-03T16:20:28Zen_US
dc.date.issued2006-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationMessina, Julia A.; Cheng, Su-Chun; Franc, Benjamin L.; Charron, Martin; Shulkin, Barry; To, Bao; Maris, John M.; Yanik, Gregory; Hawkins, Randall A.; Matthay, Katherine K. (2006). "Evaluation of semi-quantitative scoring system for metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scans in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma." Pediatric Blood & Cancer 47(7): 865-874. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55847>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1545-5009en_US
dc.identifier.issn1545-5017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55847
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16444675&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of two semi-quantitative scoring systems to assess response to 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) therapy in recurrent neuroblastoma. Procedures Diagnostic mIBG scan pairs (n = 57) were collected for patients who underwent 131 I-mIBG therapy for relapsed neuroblastoma. Two scoring systems were designated: Method 1, which divided the body into nine segments to view osteomedullary lesions with an additional tenth segment to assess soft tissue involvement; and Method 2, which divided the body into seven segments without a corresponding compartment for soft tissue involvement. Four nuclear medicine physicians independently assigned extension and intensity scores utilizing both methods, and separately recorded their impression of whether the post-therapy scan had improved, not changed, or worsened. Inter- and intra-observer concordance and correlation with overall response and progression-free survival (PFS) were performed. Results Method 1 produced the highest inter-observer concordance and was used to calculate the relative extension scores (post-therapy score divided by pre-therapy score), which correlated significantly with overall response. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (n = 21) had lower relative extension scores, compared to those without response ( P  < 0.001). The readers' overall impression associated highly ( P  < 0.001) with the relative extension scores though results were less quantitative. Concordance was higher if initial scores were >5. Relative extension score did not predict PFS. Conclusion Semi-quantitative scoring of mIBG scans provides a more reliable method of assessing response in patients with relapsed neuroblastoma than qualitative impression. The reproducibility and high inter-observer concordance makes mIBG score an important component of overall response criteria in patients with recurrent neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent348702 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of semi-quantitative scoring system for metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) scans in patients with relapsed neuroblastomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California ; Department of Pediatrics, Box 0106, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16444675en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55847/1/20777_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20777en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePediatric Blood & Canceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.