What is sexual harassment? It depends on who asks!; Framing effects on survey responses
dc.contributor.author | Galesic, Mirta | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tourangeau, Roger | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-09-20T18:14:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-04-03T18:50:27Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2007-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Galesic, Mirta; Tourangeau, Roger (2007). "What is sexual harassment? It depends on who asks! Framing effects on survey responses." Applied Cognitive Psychology 21(2): 189-202. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55952> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0888-4080 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1099-0720 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/55952 | |
dc.description.abstract | We examine the impact of the framing of the survey request––the description of the survey's sponsor and topic––on respondents' answers and describe three mechanisms that may underline such effects. Respondents can try to be relevant and cooperative and provide answers they see as the most useful; they can use the sponsorship and other elements of the survey presentation to help them understand ambiguous questions; and they may find it easier to recall instances of events related to the survey presentation. In a study that framed the survey in two different ways––one sponsored by a feminist organisation fighting against sexual harassment and the other sponsored by a neutral research institute––we found significant differences in the ways people understood and answered questions about sexual harassment. We show that all of the three mechanisms we distinguish might have affected the results. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 363685 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Psychology | en_US |
dc.title | What is sexual harassment? It depends on who asks!; Framing effects on survey responses | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, USA ; Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, USA ; Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, 1218 LeFrak Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Joint Program in Survey Methodology, University of Maryland, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55952/1/1336_ftp.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1336 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Applied Cognitive Psychology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.