Show simple item record

Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems

dc.contributor.authorEthiraj, Sendil K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T18:26:43Z
dc.date.available2008-09-08T14:25:13Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationEthiraj, Sendil K. (2007)."Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems." Strategic Management Journal 28(6): 563-584. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56000>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-2095en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0266en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56000
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. I argue that complex product systems, e.g., personal computers (PCs), are distinguished by functional interaction among several components, each guided by a relatively autonomous bundle of technical and economic characteristics. I try to explore whether the dynamics of such interactions between components of complex product systems can help us understand changes in the relative allocation of inventive effort. I advance and empirically test three hypotheses: (1) emergence of component constraints (bottlenecks) in product systems will trigger research and development (R&D) investment to resolve the constraints; (2) slack component firms have a strong incentive to invest in resolving component constraints; and (3) the incentive of slack component firms to invest in resolving component constraints is increasing in their prior sunk R&D investments in slack components. In sum, I argue that interactions between components in a product system conditions the R&D incentives of firms and also that the incentives are increasing in their prior investments or capabilities. Using product reviews from technical journals, I trace the constraint components in the PC from 1981 to 1998 and attempt to predict shifts in the allocation of inventive effort in the subsequent period. The empirical results strongly support all three hypotheses. This study highlights the paradoxical effect of modularity in complex product systems. Modular design architectures, while contributing to accelerating the pace of technical change, also tend to limit the economic benefits of firms' component R&D efforts, especially when different components technologies are progressing at different rates. This often creates an impetus to enlarge the scope of firm R&D activities beyond the component product markets that firms operate in. Other implications for R&D decision making are discussed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent202528 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherBusiness, Finance & Managementen_US
dc.titleAllocation of inventive effort in complex product systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFilm and Video Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrban Planningen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArtsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumStephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. ; Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, 701 Tappan Ave., ER 4608, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/56000/1/622_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.622en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStrategic Management Journalen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.