Show simple item record

Multivariate explanation of the 1985–1990 and 1995–2000 destination choices of newly arrived immigrants in the United States: the beginning of a new trend?

dc.contributor.authorLiaw, Kao-Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrey, William H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-20T19:12:54Z
dc.date.available2008-09-08T14:25:13Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationLiaw, Kao-Lee; Frey, William H. (2007)."Multivariate explanation of the 1985–1990 and 1995–2000 destination choices of newly arrived immigrants in the United States: the beginning of a new trend?." Population, Space and Place 13(5): 377-399. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56164>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1544-8444en_US
dc.identifier.issn1544-8452en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56164
dc.description.abstractThis paper identifies the salient features in the 1985–1990 and 1995–2000 destination choices of newly arrived immigrants, and performs multivariate explanation of these choices, based on an application of a multinomial logit model to the state-specific immigration data of the 1990 and 2000 censuses. The salient features are that: (1) the destination choice pattern of the newly arrived immigrants became more dispersed from the late 1980s to the late 1990s; (2) the change was pervasive in the sense that it was true for all combinations of five broad ethnic groups and four levels of educational attainment; (3) the change was much greater for Hispanics and Blacks than for Asians and Whites; (4) the lower the level of education, the greater the increase in dispersion; and (5) the Hispanics with the lowest education experienced the greatest increase in dispersion. Our multivariate analysis reveals that: (1) while the attraction of co-ethnic communities as destinations remained strong for both periods, it became much less intense in the late 1990s, especially for Hispanics and Blacks; (2) the newly arrived immigrants were subject to the strong pull of higher income level in both periods; (3) the pull of employment growth became stronger and more industry-specific from the late 1980s to the late 1990s; and (4) the pull of service employment growth, especially for the least-educated Hispanic immigrants, became much stronger in the later period. In the context of the progressive entrenchment of neoliberalism and the major changes in immigration policies, our empirical findings suggest that the ethnically selective dispersal of immigrants in the late 1990s is probably the beginning of a new trend. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent175738 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherEarth and Environmental Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental Science & Managementen_US
dc.titleMultivariate explanation of the 1985–1990 and 1995–2000 destination choices of newly arrived immigrants in the United States: the beginning of a new trend?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelArchitectureen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPopulation and Demographyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrban Planningen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArtsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPopulation Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA, and Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada ; School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canadaen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/56164/1/459_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp.459en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePopulation, Space and Placeen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.