Show simple item record

Development and testing of an assessment battery for older drivers

dc.contributor.authorEby, David W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMolnar, Lisa J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNation, Adam D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShope, Jean T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKostyniuk, Lidia P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-21T18:50:55Z
dc.date.available2007-11-21T18:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2006-05
dc.identifier100251en_US
dc.identifier.otherUMTRI-2006-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57294
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this project was to develop and test a comprehensive battery of assessment instruments for older drivers that was inexpensive and easy to administer. The resulting battery was developed by selecting a set of validated assessment instruments and combining them into a battery, whose total cost for acquisition was less than $900. As part of this battery, three questionnaires were developed utilizing items from established questionnaires with minor modifications. Subjects were requested to bring in each medication and supplement they were currently taking. Testing of the battery entailed administrating the battery to a convenience sample of 38 drivers aged 65 years or older. The time required to complete various portions of the battery was measured. Feedback about the battery was gathered from all subjects and the battery administrator. The study found that the assessment battery required on average less than one hour to complete. The study found that data from the assessment outcomes fell within normative ranges. In general, subjects had positive comments about the battery. Subjects felt the battery was acceptable, generally free of problems, had tasks presented in a good order, and was not too long. Most subjects felt that they did not need to bring in their medications in order to remember the names of those they were taking. Those taking several medications, however, were more likely to indicate that they might have difficulty remembering without bringing them in. We conclude, therefore, that the “brown bag” method for medication recall we used in testing should remain a part of the assessment battery. The test administrator was quite positive about the ease of administering each of the tests, except for the ruler drop test. Some subjects failed to catch the ruler, leading to difficulty in coding these outcomes. The ruler drop test was selected originally because it required no special equipment or technology. Simple reaction time is a straightforward ability to measure if technology, such as a computer, is utilized. Thus, we recommend that the ruler drop test be removed from the assessment battery and a technology-based reaction time test be included instead. In conclusion, the assessment battery described here is low-cost, transportatable, easy to administer, easy for subjects to complete, and provides a comprehensive assessment of a person’s physical health, mental health, and driving behaviors. With the replacement of the ruler-drop test with a technology-based test of reaction time, we believe that the assessment battery would serve as a valuable data collection tool for a longitudinal study of older drivers.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenters for Disease Control and Preventionen_US
dc.format.extent86en_US
dc.format.extent740672 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.subject.otherOld Aged Adultsen_US
dc.subject.otherDrivers/Vehicle Operatorsen_US
dc.subject.otherDriver Performance Testingen_US
dc.subject.otherHuman Performance Testing/ Psychomotor Testingen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and testing of an assessment battery for older driversen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57294/1/100251.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.