Show simple item record

Cross-shift peak expiratory flow changes are unassociated with respirable coal dust exposure among South African coal miners Human Subjects Declaration: All participants in this study gave written informed consent, participated voluntarily, and had the right to withdraw at any stage. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan and the Ethics Committee of University of KwaZulu-Natal.

dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Rajen N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobins, Thomas G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBecklake, Margareten_US
dc.contributor.authorSeixas, Noahen_US
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Mary Louen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-04T18:29:37Z
dc.date.available2009-01-07T20:01:16Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationNaidoo, Rajen N.; Robins, Thomas G.; Becklake, Margaret; Seixas, Noah; Thompson, Mary Lou (2007). "Cross-shift peak expiratory flow changes are unassociated with respirable coal dust exposure among South African coal miners Human Subjects Declaration: All participants in this study gave written informed consent, participated voluntarily, and had the right to withdraw at any stage. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan and the Ethics Committee of University of KwaZulu-Natal. ." American Journal of Industrial Medicine 50(12): 992-998. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57355>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0271-3586en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0274en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57355
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17918230&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground The objectives of this study were to determine whether cross-shift changes in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were related to respirable dust exposure in South African coalminers. Methods Fifty workers were randomly selected from a cohort of 684 miners from 3 bituminous coalmines in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Peak expiratory efforts were measured prior to the commencement of the shift, and at the end of the shift on at least two occasions separated by at least 2 weeks, with full shift personal dust sampling being conducted on each occasion for each participant. Interviews were conducted, work histories were obtained and cumulative exposure estimates were constructed. Regression models examined the associations of cross-shift changes in PEFR with current and cumulative exposure, controlling for shift, smoking and past history of tuberculosis. Results There were marginal differences in cross-shift PEFR (ranging from 0.1 to 2 L/min). Linear regression analyses showed no association between cross-shift change in PEFR and current or cumulative exposure. The specific shift worked by participants in the study showed no effect. Conclusions Our study showed no association between current respirable dust exposure and cross-shift changes in PEFR. There was a non-significant protective effect of cumulative dust exposure on the outcome, suggesting the presence of a “healthy worker survivor effect” in this data. Am. J. Ind. Med. 50:992–998, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent116553 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherOccupational Health and Environmental Toxicologyen_US
dc.titleCross-shift peak expiratory flow changes are unassociated with respirable coal dust exposure among South African coal miners Human Subjects Declaration: All participants in this study gave written informed consent, participated voluntarily, and had the right to withdraw at any stage. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan and the Ethics Committee of University of KwaZulu-Natal.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCentre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa ; Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag x7, Congella 4013, South Africa.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University/Montreal Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Montreal Chest Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Environmental Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washingtonen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiostatistics Unit, Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17918230en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57355/1/20513_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20513en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.