Show simple item record

Does urethral competence affect urodynamic voiding parameters in women with prolapse?

dc.contributor.authorNygaard, Ingrid E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKreder, Karlen_US
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Elizabeth R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrubaker, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoode, Patricia S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVisco, Anthony G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Anne M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCundiff, Geoffrey W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWei, Johnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-04T18:31:16Z
dc.date.available2008-11-05T15:05:43Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationNygaard, Ingrid; Kreder, Karl; Mueller, Elizabeth; Brubaker, Linda; Goode, Patricia; Visco, Anthony; Weber, Anne M.; Cundiff, Geoff; Wei, John (2007). "Does urethral competence affect urodynamic voiding parameters in women with prolapse?." Neurourology and Urodynamics 26(7): 1030-1035. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57365>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57365
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17638306&dopt=citation
dc.description.abstractAims To (1) compare voiding parameters and (2) correlate symptoms and urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and varying degrees of urethral competence. Methods We compared three groups of women with stages II–IV POP. Groups 1 and 2 were symptomatically stress continent women participating in the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) trial; during prolapse reduction before sacrocolpopexy, Group 1 (n = 67) did not have and Group 2 (n = 84) had urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) during prolapse reduction. Group 3 participants (n = 74), recruited specifically for this study, had stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms and planned sacrocolpopexy. Participants completed standardized uroflowmetry, pressure voiding studies, and validated symptom questionnaires. Results Subjects' median age was 61 years, median parity 3 and 87% had stage III or IV POP. Fourteen percent of women in Group 3 demonstrated USI without, and 70% with, prolapse reduction. Women in Groups 2 and 3 had more detrusor overactivity (DO) than Group 1 (17 and 24% vs. 6%, P  = 0.02) and detrusor overactivity incontinence (DOI) (15 and 8% vs. 0%, P  = 0.004). Based on the Blaivis–Groutz nomogram, 60% of all women were obstructed. Post-void residual volume (PVR), peak flow rate, detrusor pressure at peak flow, voiding mechanisms, voiding patterns, obstruction and urinary retention did not differ among groups. Women in Group 3 had higher irritative and obstructive symptom scores than Group 1 or 2; neither score differed by presence of DO nor obstruction, respectively. Conclusion Women with POP have significant rates of urodynamic obstruction and retention, independent of their continence status. Symptoms of obstruction and retention correlate poorly with urodynamic findings. Neurourol. Urodynam. 26:1030–1035, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent119454 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMiscellaneous Medicalen_US
dc.titleDoes urethral competence affect urodynamic voiding parameters in women with prolapse?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah College of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, Room 2B 242, Salt Lake City, UT 84132en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinoisen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinoisen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBirmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabamaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Institute for Child Health and Human Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17638306
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57365/1/20436_ftp.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.20436en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.