Show simple item record

Fish distributions among habitats in the littoral zone of Douglas Lake

dc.contributor.authorAepelbacher, Tom
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-05T21:07:04Z
dc.date.available2007-12-05T21:07:04Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57416
dc.descriptionStudent Paperen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to sample fish community composition in different habitat types found in Douglas Lake in Cheboygan County, Michigan and to determine if the composition of the community varies with habitat. To set up this study, we chose four different habitat types: sandy, cobble, woody debris, and vegetated. At each different habitat location in Douglas Lake, we set up a gang of five minnow traps that were used to sample the fish species diversity and abundance at each habitat type. The Kruskal-Wallis test shows that there is not a statistically significant difference in species richness, CPUE per day, and diversity index values between the four sites that we sampled. There is no statistical difference but the data supports a trend in which species diversity, species richness, and average CPUE per site is highest at the vegetated habitat and lowest at the sandy habitat.en_US
dc.format.extent493867 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectFISHESen_US
dc.subjectHABITATen_US
dc.subjectSELECTIONen_US
dc.subjectCOMMUNITYen_US
dc.titleFish distributions among habitats in the littoral zone of Douglas Lakeen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57416/1/Aepelbacher_Tom_2007.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.