Show simple item record

Patterns and Consequences of Competition for Pollination between Introduced and Native Species with Different Floral Traits.

dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Benjamin R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-16T15:17:11Z
dc.date.available2008-01-16T15:17:11Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57713
dc.description.abstractCompetition for pollinators and avoidance of heterospecific pollen transfer have been assumed to be important factors promoting the evolution of specialized (restricted) floral morphologies. To test these assumptions, I performed field and greenhouse studies on prairie plants in Iowa. I also examined whether self-incompatibility reduces detrimental effects of heterospecific pollen. In a field study, neither Sisyrinchium campestre (Iridaceae) with an unrestrictive floral morphology nor Viola pedatifida (Violaceae) with a restrictive floral morphology showed a decrease in fruit or seed set when growing near patches of introduced Euphorbia esula (Euphorbiaceae) indicating that competition for pollination was weak or absent. In a survey of 29 species, plants with restrictive floral morphologies experienced less pollinator overlap with Euphorbia and received significantly less Euphorbia and other heterospecific pollen than those with unrestrictive (open) floral morphologies, as predicted. However, flowers with unrestrictive morphologies had significantly larger stigmas, and the density of heterospecific pollen (per stigmatic area) did not differ significantly between floral morphologies. Thus, correlated effects of stigma size may explain the patterns of heterospecific pollen receipt. Large quantities of Euphorbia pollen added to stigmas prior to conspecific pollen had no effect on fecundity for two self-incompatible species and reduced fecundity for three self-compatible species, as predicted. However, two other self-compatible species were not significantly affected, indicating that this relationship needs further testing. Additional experiments with two species demonstrated that Euphorbia pollen receipt is unlikely to affect fecundity in nature because reducing the quantity of Euphorbia pollen applied or eliminating the time delay between Euphorbia and conspecific pollen application reduced effects of heterospecific pollen receipt. To further explore the effects of relative abundance, pollinator visitation rates, and pollen carryover on competition by interspecific pollen loss, analytical and simulation models were developed which indicate that rare plants receiving few visits are most affected by pollen loss. Furthermore, increased pollen carryover is expected to result in the same average pollen receipt, but with a more uniform pollen distribution. This could increase or decrease competition by pollen loss, depending on the relationship between pollen receipt and pollination success.en_US
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.extent941345 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCompetition for Pollinationen_US
dc.subjectEuphorbia Esulaen_US
dc.subjectLeafy Spurgeen_US
dc.subjectHeterospecific Pollen Receipten_US
dc.subjectInterspecific Pollen Transferen_US
dc.subjectFloral Specializationen_US
dc.titlePatterns and Consequences of Competition for Pollination between Introduced and Native Species with Different Floral Traits.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRathcke, Beverly J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGoldberg, Deborah E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSilverman, Emilyen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWerner, Earl E.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/57713/2/brmontgo_1.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.