Show simple item record

Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms

dc.contributor.authorGe, Junen_US
dc.contributor.authorHadjiiski, Lubomir M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSahiner, Berkmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWei, Junen_US
dc.contributor.authorHelvie, Mark A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Chuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Heang-Pingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-02T14:33:37Z
dc.date.available2008-04-02T14:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2007-02-21en_US
dc.identifier.citationGe, Jun; Hadjiiski, Lubomir M; Sahiner, Berkman; Wei, Jun; Helvie, Mark A; Zhou, Chuan; Chan, Heang-Ping (2007). "Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms." Physics in Medicine and Biology. 52(4): 981-1000. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58099>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-9155en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58099
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17264365&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractWe have developed a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to detect clustered microcalcifications automatically on full-field digital mammograms (FFDMs) and a CAD system for screen-film mammograms (SFMs). The two systems used the same computer vision algorithms but their false positive (FP) classifiers were trained separately with sample images of each modality. In this study, we compared the performance of the CAD systems for detection of clustered microcalcifications on pairs of FFDM and SFM obtained from the same patient. For case-based performance evaluation, the FFDM CAD system achieved detection sensitivities of 70%, 80% and 90% at an average FP cluster rate of 0.07, 0.16 and 0.63 per image, compared with an average FP cluster rate of 0.15, 0.38 and 2.02 per image for the SFM CAD system. The difference was statistically significant with the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) analysis. When evaluated on data sets negative for microcalcification clusters, the average FP cluster rates of the FFDM CAD system were 0.04, 0.11 and 0.33 per image at detection sensitivity level of 70%, 80% and 90% compared with an average FP cluster rate of 0.08, 0.14 and 0.50 per image for the SFM CAD system. When evaluated for malignant cases only, the difference of the performance of the two CAD systems was not statistically significant with AFROC analysis.en_US
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.extent472857 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltden_US
dc.titleComputer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammogramsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, CGC B2103, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, CGC B2103, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, CGC B2103, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, CGC B2103, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, CGC B2103, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, CGC B2103, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, CGC B2103, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid17264365en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/58099/2/pmb7_4_008.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/008en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePhysics in Medicine and Biology.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.