Show simple item record

A Legibility Equation for Determining Ideal Viewing Areas in Lecture Halls.

dc.contributor.authorCai, Hongyien_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-08T19:02:35Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2008-05-08T19:02:35Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/58415
dc.description.abstractText presented in modern lecture halls often simultaneously appears on multiple visual media (e.g., blackboard, projection screens, TV) that have different locations, geometries, orientations, and lighting conditions. An ideal viewing area inside which all text is legible to the entire audience could be calculated using equations that predict the spatial legibility of text viewed from any directions across the lecture hall. However, among the 95 legibility equations ever published in the literature, none can serve this purpose. After using ten assumptions to narrow down the research scope, this study applies a constant-solid-angle hypothesis to develop the demanded equation from the existing Howett’s equation (1983). This derived equation examines seven critical factors but the surrounding luminance of the ambient environment, which may reduce its accuracy. The hypothesis is first verified consistent with how retinal images of text activate cones in the centre fovea of an observer’s eyes, then tested in the lighting laboratory at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute using legibility data collected from 3 subjects in a pilot experiment and 20 subjects in a follow-up main experiment. Both experimental setups abide by the typical viewing conditions surveyed in 38 lecture halls at the University of Michigan. The outcomes show that the hypothesis holds when incident angle is 0-65.7 degree, but it does not hold when 65.7-82.8 degree (the largest angle examined). The derived equation is thus accordingly improved. Moreover, this study uses 20 human subjects with a modified setup at four different ambient light levels in the same laboratory to verify the negligible effect of ambient light on legibility. The validated equation is then improved and used as the underlying algorithm for developing a computation-program-aided design method in MatLab. This method allows architects to find an overlapped two-dimensional ideal viewing area of text viewed in modern lecture halls along any viewing plane, such as that parallel to the sloped floor at eye height level. This program-aided method is verified using a field experiment carried out in the lecture hall in the Art & Architecture building at the University of Michigan.en_US
dc.format.extent4012381 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectLegibilityen_US
dc.subjectIdeal Viewing Areaen_US
dc.subjectLecture Hallen_US
dc.subjectLegibility Equationen_US
dc.subjectViewing Angleen_US
dc.subjectComputation-program-Aided Design Methoden_US
dc.titleA Legibility Equation for Determining Ideal Viewing Areas in Lecture Halls.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineArchitectureen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKim, Jong-Jinen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGreen, Paul A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPastalan, Leon A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWineman, Jean D.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelArchitectureen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEngineering (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelIndustrial and Operations Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArtsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/58415/1/hcai_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.