Show simple item record

Factors predicting additional disease in the axilla in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2–6, 2006.

dc.contributor.authorJeruss, Jacqueline S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Lisa A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAyers, Gregory D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCristofanilli, Massimoen_US
dc.contributor.authorBroglio, Kristine R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMeric-Bernstam, Fundaen_US
dc.contributor.authorYi, Minen_US
dc.contributor.authorWaljee, Jennifer F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Merrick I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Kelly K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-01T14:06:33Z
dc.date.available2009-07-06T16:34:52Zen_US
dc.date.issued2008-06-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationJeruss, Jacqueline S.; Newman, Lisa A.; Ayers, Gregory D.; Cristofanilli, Massimo; Broglio, Kristine R.; Meric-Bernstam, Funda; Yi, Min; Waljee, Jennifer F.; Ross, Merrick I.; Hunt, Kelly K. (2008). "Factors predicting additional disease in the axilla in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2–6, 2006. ." Cancer 112(12): 2646-2654. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60214>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60214
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18442039&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. The utility of sentinel lymph node (SNL) biopsy (SLNB) as a predictor of axillary lymph node status is similar in patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients who undergo surgery first. The authors of this study hypothesized that patients with positive SLNs after neoadjuvant therapy would have unique clinicopathologic factors that would be predictive of additional positive non-SLNs distinct from patients who underwent surgery first. METHODS. One hundred four patients were identified who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, had a positive SLN, and underwent axillary dissection between 1997 and 2005. At the time of presentation, 66 patients had clinically negative lymph nodes by ultrasonography, and 38 patients had positive lymph nodes confirmed by fine-needle aspiration. Eighteen factors were assessed for their ability to predict positive non-SLNs using chi-square and logistic regression analysis with a bootstrapped, backwards elimination procedure. The resulting nomogram was tested by using a patient cohort from another institution. RESULTS. Patients with clinically negative lymph nodes at presentation were less likely than patients with positive lymph nodes to have positive non-SLNs (47% vs 71%; P = .017). On multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion, the method for detecting SLN metastasis, multicentricity, positive axillary lymph nodes at presentation, and pathologic tumor size retained grouped significance with a bootstrap-adjusted area under the curve (AUC) of 0.762. The resulting nomogram was validated in the external patient cohort (AUC, 0.78). CONCLUSIONS. A significant proportion of patients with positive SLNs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no positive non-SLNs. The use of a nomogram based on 5 predictive variables that were identified in this study may be useful for predicting the risk of positive non-SLNs in patients who have positive SLNs after chemotherapy. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent149869 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleFactors predicting additional disease in the axilla in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2–6, 2006.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennesseeen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas ; Fax: (713) 792-4689 ; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 444, Houston, TX 77030en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18442039en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60214/1/23481_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23481en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.