Show simple item record

Performance effects of imitative entry

dc.contributor.authorEthiraj, Sendil K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhu, David H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-01T14:07:50Z
dc.date.available2009-08-12T18:32:18Zen_US
dc.date.issued2008-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationEthiraj, Sendil K.; Zhu, David H. (2008). "Performance effects of imitative entry." Strategic Management Journal 29(8): 797-817. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60219>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-2095en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0266en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60219
dc.description.abstractThis article examines how waiting to imitate a product affects the performance of the imitator compared to the innovator. Specifically, we address two research questions. Under what conditions does imitation erode the advantage of the innovator? What strategies of imitators help overcome the innovator's advantage? Our main argument is that the increasing availability of information on the innovator's product increases the imitator's returns to waiting. With this increasing availability of information, imitators' products transition from those that are horizontally differentiated (products are similar in quality but differ in their attributes) to those that are vertically differentiated (products differ in quality). Thus, we hypothesize that shifts in the nature of competition over time from horizontal differentiation to vertical differentiation account for why the innovator's advantage is not preserved. Imitation timing simply reflects the uncertainty inherent in imitation efforts. One such uncertainty is the extent of product differentiation that the imitator can achieve. We develop several hypotheses that elaborate this basic intuition. We obtained detailed data on innovator-imitator competition in the branded drug industry to test the hypotheses. All our hypotheses are supported. The main contribution of the article is in showing that the nature of product differentiation in product categories is endogenous to the imitative entry decisions of firms. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent212742 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherBusiness, Finance & Managementen_US
dc.titlePerformance effects of imitative entryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFilm and Video Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrban Planningen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArtsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumStephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. ; Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, 701 Tappan Avenue, ER4608, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumStephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60219/1/696_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.696en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStrategic Management Journalen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.