Greener Grass? Factors Related to Reducing Environmental Impacts of Lawn Care Companies
dc.contributor.author | McDade, Keith William | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-08-25T20:50:33Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2008-08-25T20:50:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | en_US | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60652 | |
dc.description.abstract | Lawn care companies, in response to the cultural norm of a green, weed-free lawn, are providing services that can negatively impact both ecological and human health. Since these companies have widespread impacts and are relied upon for their expert decisions, it is useful to understand factors that influence their practices. This study examines the roles that psychological factors, company characteristics and use of information sources play in influencing lawn care companies’ decisions regarding fertilizer and pesticide application. The intention is to identify strategies for improving communication with lawn care companies as a means of influencing their practices. Interviews (n=29) and a survey (n=65) administered in southern Michigan explored how company characteristics and psychological factors affect lawn care companies’ use of information sources. Then, each of these three domains was examined for their effect on a variety of lawn care practices involving fertilizer and pesticide use. Findings suggest that lawn care managers’ motivations match their use of information sources; for example, companies with managers motivated by business considerations were significantly more likely to use industry-promoting information sources. With respect to practices, industry-promoting information sources were shown to be related to use of preferred fertilizers (such as slow-release nitrogen), but also to damaging pesticide practices (such as weed-n-feed). Furthermore, larger lawn care companies made more applications per year and were significantly less likely to engage in preferred pesticide practices (such as Integrated Pest Management). Recommendations are detailed to assist organizations that communicate with lawn care companies in efforts to improve ecological and human health. These organizations should consider utilizing industry-promoting sources, targeting larger companies, and framing the messages to match the motivations salient for the greatest percentage of lawn care companies—business considerations. In addition, efforts could be made to simultaneously address the cultural norm of the weed-free lawn aesthetic, and to encourage lawn care companies to recognize that they can be agents of change to reduce impacts on the environment. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 550646 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1373 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject | Lawn Care | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental Communication | en_US |
dc.subject | Use of Information | en_US |
dc.title | Greener Grass? Factors Related to Reducing Environmental Impacts of Lawn Care Companies | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Natural Resources and Environment | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Deyoung, Raymond K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Kaplan, Rachel | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Norton, Richard K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Wondolleck, Julia M. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60652/1/mcdade_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.