Show simple item record

Planning for Open Space Conservation: Using GIS to Match Cultural Values and Ecological Quality of Open Spaces.

dc.contributor.authorWang, Zhifangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-25T20:52:22Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2008-08-25T20:52:22Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60704
dc.description.abstractThe dilemma for open space conservation in exurbia is that, while people move to exurbia for open space experiences and to be closer to environments that they perceive as natural, exurban development occupies open space and impacts the structure, function and dynamics of ecological systems. The aim of this dissertation is to explore the values associated with living near open space, which is essential to successful conservation efforts because of the critical role that human preference can play in strategic exurban planning and the future shape of broader landscape patterns. Three issues are discussed in three Chapters. Chapter II examines how nearby open space and differences among types of open spaces, may be related to exurban residents’ home-buying choices. It suggests that open space plays an important role in exurban homeowners’ home-buying choices. And exurban homeowners have varied preferences for different types of open spaces, which should be designed / planed with different strategies. Chapter III is a theoretical exploration of potential causal explanations for relationships between preference for having open space near one’s home and actually having open space landuse / landcover (LULC) near one’s home. It suggests that people’s choice of living environment, may cause them to value nearby open space, rather than nearby open space inculcating human preference. And, maintaining forests and wetlands as a part of exurban landscapes can be part of strategic planning efforts that satisfy respondents’ preference and simultaneously preserve open space as natural habitat. Chapter IV investigates potentials and challenges of using landscape metrics to infer cultural values of landscapes. The study suggests that landscape metrics may not validly measure landcover characteristics that are related to some landscape cultural values for many possible reasons including: inherent limitations of metrics tested, construct differences between planimetric data and landscape experience, data resolution etc. People are generally unwilling to give up their desires and needs, but we can use what we know about human preference and need to formulate new landscape patterns. A better understanding of the values associated with living near open space will contribute to the development of new sustainable landscape patterns in exurbia.en_US
dc.format.extent1330074 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectOpen Spaceen_US
dc.subjectGISen_US
dc.subjectPreferenceen_US
dc.subjectLandscape Planningen_US
dc.subjectEcological Qualityen_US
dc.subjectCultural Valuesen_US
dc.titlePlanning for Open Space Conservation: Using GIS to Match Cultural Values and Ecological Quality of Open Spaces.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLandscape Architectureen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberNassauer, Joan I.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBrown, Daniel G.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGobster, Paul H.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMarans, Robert W.en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArtsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60704/1/zhifangw_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.