Show simple item record

Factors Affecting Consumers' Responses to Direct-to-Consumer Advertising.

dc.contributor.authorSchueler, Kirk R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-25T20:55:48Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2008-08-25T20:55:48Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60809
dc.description.abstractPharmaceutical companies utilize Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) advertising to generate consumer discussions with physicians and increase prescriptions. The dissertation seeks to answer a question not fully addressed in the literature: which consumers respond to DTC by intending to discuss the message with their doctor and why? Five hundred and twenty four respondents between the ages of thirty and fifty-five provided information about their opinion of DTC advertising, previous DTC-initiated discussion experience, personality characteristics, and health behaviors as well as information related to elevated cholesterol, treatment strategies, and level of concern. The investigator evaluated nine hypotheses including that intent to discuss DTC messages with physicians would be significantly higher in individuals for whom the medical condition is highly self-relevant and whose regulatory focus is promotion, compared to those whose regulatory focus is prevention, with this difference most apparent when benefits and risks were both perceived as high. Other evaluated factors include impact on discussion intent of consumers’ proactivity in addressing their health, relationships with health professionals, and personality characteristics. Self-relevance was measured as the level of concern regarding respondent’s personal cholesterol level. Regulatory focus of respondents was determined using the eleven-item Regulatory Focus Questionnaire, and a health-specific question. Respondents were randomly assigned in a 2 (high or low self-relevance) x 2 (promotion or prevention) x 2 (message A or B) design to view a non-product written message with either promotion or prevention framing and one of two product-specific television advertisements. Intent to discuss messages and ads was measured on a 5-point scale from very low to very high. Results indicate that high self-relevance is associated with higher discussion intent. Promotion-focused consumers are more responsive to benefit messages and tolerant of product risks. Prevention-focused consumers have lower discussion intent due to greater sensitivity to drug risks. Discussions are more likely when consumers take a proactive approach to health and have trusting physician and pharmacist relationships. Previous discussion experience predisposes one to future discussions. Personality characteristics are of limited significance with regard to discussion intent. The results raise questions regarding the current FDA requirements for communication of risk information. Future research opportunities are identified.en_US
dc.format.extent998709 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDTCen_US
dc.subjectDirect-to-Consumer Advertisingen_US
dc.subjectPrescription Drugsen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory Focusen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Relevanceen_US
dc.subjectPerceived Risken_US
dc.titleFactors Affecting Consumers' Responses to Direct-to-Consumer Advertising.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth Services Organization and Policy and Business Adminen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBagozzi, Richard P.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSmith, Dean G.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberAscione, Frank J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCameron, Kim S.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHirth, Richard A.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60809/1/kirkrs_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.