Riddles and Revelations: Forms of Incest Telling in 20th -Century America.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yoshikawa, Mako E. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2008-08-25T20:56:47Z
dc.date.available NO_RESTRICTION en_US
dc.date.available 2008-08-25T20:56:47Z
dc.date.issued 2008 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2008 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60839
dc.description.abstract This inquiry into contemporary forms of the incest narrative focuses on three women writers who subvert and reinvent the standard incest model for their own ends. Since the beginnings of Western literature, incest telling has been tricked out in riddles. In Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex, a question—why is there a plague on Thebes?—takes the title character on a quest which eventually leads to the dread answer: because its king is sleeping with his mother. Incest hides in this narrative, its secret waiting to be recognized and decoded. Oedipus remains the archetypal incest story; the riddle form is the standard incest model. But the work of Maxine Hong Kingston, Willa Cather and Kathryn Harrison has done much to change the way that incest is usually told. The standard incest model confirms our belief in incest as a shocking transgression. When the discovery of incest is delayed through riddling, the assumption is that telling this transgression is so fraught it can derail the narrative; it is so horrific that we have to approach it obliquely. In that it defers the announcement of incest through the scattering of clues—the narrative equivalent of clearing one’s throat—the riddle form affirms the view that speaking of incest is as vexed and potentially traumatic as the act itself. By subverting the riddle form, Kingston, Cather, and Harrison not only challenge the way that incest is traditionally told, they also redefine what is and what is not sayable. In “No Name Woman,” Kingston uses incest as a stepping stone to arrive at another, more forbidden revelation. In Sapphira and the Slave Girl, Cather provides what seems to be a textbook incest riddle, but elides the revelation; she uses the unanswered incest riddle to indict the system of slavery and the way it blinkers those who participate in it. In The Kiss, Harrison eschews riddling altogether, casually referring to her sexual relationship with her father on the first page of the text; she thus comments on incest itself—how common it is, how undramatic and unrevelatory to its traumatized victims. en_US
dc.format.extent 130861 bytes
dc.format.extent 537035 bytes
dc.format.extent 449080 bytes
dc.format.extent 1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Incest en_US
dc.subject Incest and Riddles en_US
dc.subject Incest and Miscegenation en_US
dc.subject Maxine Hong Kingston en_US
dc.subject Willa Cather en_US
dc.subject Kathryn Harrison en_US
dc.title Riddles and Revelations: Forms of Incest Telling in 20th -Century America. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreename Ph.D. en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline English Language & Literature en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Yaeger, Patricia Smith en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Anderson, Paul A. en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Gikandi, Simon E. en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Miller, Joshua L. en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel Humanities en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurl http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60839/1/makoy_1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurl http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60839/2/makoy_2.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurl http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60839/3/makoy_3.pdf
dc.owningcollname Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)
 Show simple item record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search Deep Blue

Advanced Search

Browse by

My Account


Available Now

MLibrary logo