The correlation of voiding variables between non-instrumented uroflowmetery and pressure-flow studies in women with pelvic organ prolapse
dc.contributor.author | Mueller, Elizabeth R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, John | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nygaard, Ingrid E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brubaker, Linda | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Varner, Ed | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Visco, Anthony G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cundiff, Geoffrey W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weber, Anne M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ghetti, Chiara | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kreder, Karl | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-08-27T20:04:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-02T17:27:37Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2008-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Mueller, Elizabeth; Wei, John; Nygaard, Ingrid; Brubaker, Linda; Varner, Ed; Visco, Anthony; Cundiff, Geoffrey W.; Weber, Anne M.; Ghetti, Chiara; Kreder, Karl (2008). "The correlation of voiding variables between non-instrumented uroflowmetery and pressure-flow studies in women with pelvic organ prolapse." Neurourology and Urodynamics 27(6): 515-521. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60897> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-2467 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1520-6777 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/60897 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18551567&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Aims To (1) correlate peak and maximum flow rates from non-instrumented flow (NIF) and pressure-flow studies (PFS) in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP); (2) measure the impact of voided volume and degree of prolapse on correlations. Methods We compared four groups of women with stages II–IV POP. Groups 1 and 2 were symptomatically stress continent women participating in the colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE) trial; during prolapse reduction before sacrocolpopexy, Group 1 (n = 67) did not have and Group 2 (n = 84) had urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). Group 3 (n = 74) and Group 4 participants (n = 73), recruited specifically for this study, had stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms. Group 3 planned sacrocolpopexy. Group 4 planned a different treatment option. Participants completed standardized uroflowmetry and pressure voiding studies. Results Subjects' median age was 61 years; median parity 3% and 80% had stage III or IV POP. Based on the Blaivas–Groutz nomogram, 49% of all women were obstructed. NIF and PFS peak and average flow rates had low correlations with one another (0.31, P < 0.001 and 0.35, P < 0.001, respectively). When NIF and PFS voided volumes were within 25% of each other, the peak and average flow rate correlations improved (0.52, P < 0.001 and 0.57, P < 0.001, respectively). As vaginal prolapse increased, correlations between NIF and PFS peak and average flow rates decreased. Conclusion Peak and average flow rates are highly dependent on voided volume in women with prolapse. As the prolapse stage increases, correlations between NIF and PFS variables decrease. Neurourol. Urodynam. 27:515–521, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 214668 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Life and Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Miscellaneous Medical | en_US |
dc.title | The correlation of voiding variables between non-instrumented uroflowmetery and pressure-flow studies in women with pelvic organ prolapse | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois ; Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S. First Avenue, Building 103, Room 1004, Maywood, IL 60153. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Urology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18551567 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/60897/1/20568_ftp.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.20568 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Neurourology and Urodynamics | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.