Show simple item record

Occupational allergy and asthma among salt water fish processing workers

dc.contributor.authorJeebhay, Mohamed F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobins, Thomas G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Mary E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmuts, Mariusen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaatjies, Roslynnen_US
dc.contributor.authorLopata, Andreas L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-01T21:01:21Z
dc.date.available2010-01-05T16:59:14Zen_US
dc.date.issued2008-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationJeebhay, Mohamed F.; Robins, Thomas G.; Miller, Mary E.; Bateman, Eric; Smuts, Marius; Baatjies, Roslynn; Lopata, Andreas L. (2008). "Occupational allergy and asthma among salt water fish processing workers." American Journal of Industrial Medicine 51(12): 899-910. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61335>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0271-3586en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0274en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61335
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18726880&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Fish processing is a common economic activity in Southern Africa. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and host determinants of allergic symptoms, allergic sensitization, bronchial hyper-responsiveness and asthma among workers processing saltwater fish. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 594 currently employed workers in two processing plants involved in pilchard canning and fishmeal processing. A modified European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) questionnaire was used. Skin prick tests (SPT) used extracts of common airborne allergens, fresh fish (pilchard, anchovy, maasbanker, mackerel, red eye) and fishmeal. Spirometry and methacholine challenge tests (MCTs; tidal breathing method) used ATS guidelines. Results Work-related ocular-nasal symptoms (26%) were more common than asthma symptoms (16%). The prevalence of atopy was 36%, while 7% were sensitized to fish species and 26% had NSBH (PC 20  ≤ 8 mg/ml or ≥12% increase in FEV 1 post-bronchodilator). The prevalence of probable occupational asthma was 1.8% and fish allergic rhino-conjunctivitis 2.6%. Women were more likely to report work-related asthma symptoms (OR = 1.94) and have NSBH (OR = 3.09), while men were more likely to be sensitized to fish (OR = 2.06) and have airway obstruction (OR = 4.17). Atopy (OR = 3.16) and current smoking (OR = 2.37), but not habitual seafood consumption were associated with sensitization to fish. Conclusions Based on comparison with previous published studies, the prevalence of occupational asthma to salt water fish is lower than due to shellfish. The gendered distribution of work and exposures in fish processing operations together with atopy and cigarette smoking are important determinants of occupational allergy and asthma. Am. J. Ind. Med. 51:899–910, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent154691 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherOccupational Health and Environmental Toxicologyen_US
dc.titleOccupational allergy and asthma among salt water fish processing workersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOccupational and Environmental Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa ; Associate Professor. ; Occupational and Environmental Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Room 4.44, Fourth Level, Falmouth Building, Anzio Road, Observatory, Western Cape 7925, South Africa.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Labour and Industries, Seattle, Washingtonen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNutritional Intervention Research Unit, Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, Western Cape, South Africa ; School of Physiology, Nutrition and Consumer Science, University of North-West, Potchefstroom, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOccupational and Environmental Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAllergy and Asthma Research Group, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa ; School of Applied Science, Food Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18726880en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/61335/1/20635_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20635en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.