Show simple item record

Nonparametric comparison of two survival functions with dependent censoring via nonparametric multiple imputation

dc.contributor.authorHsu, Chiu-Hsiehen_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Jeremy M. G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-03T16:17:34Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T17:40:06Zen_US
dc.date.issued2009-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationHsu, Chiu-Hsieh; Taylor, Jeremy M. G. (2009). "Nonparametric comparison of two survival functions with dependent censoring via nonparametric multiple imputation." Statistics in Medicine 28(3): 462-475. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61537>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61537
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18991250&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractWhen the event time of interest depends on the censoring time, conventional two-sample test methods, such as the log-rank and Wilcoxon tests, can produce an invalid test result. We extend our previous work on estimation using auxiliary variables to adjust for dependent censoring via multiple imputation, to the comparison of two survival distributions. To conduct the imputation, we use two working models to define a set of similar observations called the imputing risk set. One model is for the event times and the other for the censoring times. Based on the imputing risk set, a nonparametric multiple imputation method, Kaplan–Meier imputation, is used to impute a future event or censoring time for each censored observation. After imputation, the conventional nonparametric two-sample tests can be easily implemented on the augmented data sets. Simulation studies show that the sizes of the log-rank and Wilcoxon tests constructed on the imputed data sets are comparable to the nominal level and the powers are much higher compared with the tests based on the unimputed data in the presence of dependent censoring if either one of the two working models is correctly specified. The method is illustrated using AIDS clinical trial data comparing ZDV and placebo, in which CD4 count is the time-dependent auxiliary variable. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent114177 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherMathematics and Statisticsen_US
dc.titleNonparametric comparison of two survival functions with dependent censoring via nonparametric multiple imputationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, U.S.A. ; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18991250en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/61537/1/3480_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3480en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.