Cognitive Aging and Survey Measurement.
dc.contributor.author | Ziniel, Sonja Irene | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-05T19:34:12Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-05T19:34:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | en_US | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61736 | |
dc.description.abstract | Increases in life expectancy and progress in medical treatments will dramatically change the age distribution of Western societies over the next few decades. The U.S. population of people age 65 and older is expected to double from 36 million in 2003 to 72 million in 2030, representing an increase from 12% of the population in 2003 to 20% in 2030. These demographic shifts pose a major challenge for survey methodologists. Normal aging is associated with a decline in many cognitive abilities that play a prominent role in the processes underlying respondents’ answers to survey questions. Hence, normal cognitive aging may be associated with increased difficulties in answering survey questions, resulting in poorer data quality. This dissertation addresses this possibility and explores when and how cognitive aging can introduce survey errors. It consists of three essays. The first essay addresses whether age-related decline in cognitive functioning increases the likelihood that respondents rely on cognitively less taxing response strategies when answering behavioral frequency questions. The results show that older respondents are more likely to use strategies associated with overreporting, although reliance on these strategies did not produce overall differences in response accuracy. The second essay attempts to disentangle the influence of cognitive aging, decline in physical health and changes in social networks on panel attrition in studies of the elderly. It shows that cognitive aging as well as physical decline increase the likelihood of a proxy-interview compared to a self-interview in the next wave but exert no influence on the likelihood of a refusal. The use of proxy interviews seems to be an important tool to minimize panel attrition bias. The third essay explores how diurnal cycles influence the quality of older respondents’ survey answers. In general, older adults show better cognitive performance early rather than late in the day, suggesting that time-of-day of the interview may affect data quality. This hypothesis received no support, nor could the usually obtained diurnal differences in cognitive functioning be observed in the survey context. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 2330295 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1373 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/octet-stream | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Cognitive Aging | en_US |
dc.subject | Survey Methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | Behavioral Frequency Questions | en_US |
dc.subject | Panel Attrition | en_US |
dc.title | Cognitive Aging and Survey Measurement. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Survey Methodology | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Schwarz, Norbert W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Conrad, Frederick G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Groves, Robert M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Heeringa, Steven G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Kahn, Robert L. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Social Sciences (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/61736/1/sziniel_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.