Show simple item record

Access to Conventional Mental Health and Medical Care Among Users of Complementary and Alternative Medicine With Bipolar Disorder

dc.contributor.authorPerron, Brian
dc.contributor.authorJarman, Christopher N.
dc.contributor.authorKilbourne, Amy M.
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-21T16:27:14Z
dc.date.available2009-04-21T16:27:14Z
dc.date.issued2009-04
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 197, no. 4, 2009, pp - 287-290 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/62077>en
dc.identifier.issn0022-3018/09/19704-0287
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/62077
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19363387&dopt=citation
dc.description.abstractThis research examined the role of perceived barriers to treatment as a potential contributor to the increasing use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among mentally ill populations. The study examined a sample of 435 patients receiving care through the Veterans Administration Health System and having a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder (I, II, NOS), cyclothymia, or schizoaffective disorder-bipolar subtype. Access to care and use of any of 14 CAM therapies within the past year were studied. Physical CAM users reported slightly better mental health service access related to getting to mental health services and obtaining emergency mental health services when needed. Effect sizes for these differences were small (r(pb) = 0.09 and 0.13, respectively). Similarly, oral and cognitive CAM users indicated that they were slightly more likely to go without medical services when needed because they were too expensive. These effect sizes were also very small (r(pb) = 0.12 and 0.10, respectively), suggesting no clinical significance. Patients who reported use of oral and/or cognitive CAM therapies were slightly more likely than nonusers to go without medical care because of excessive costs. Patients having non-Veterans Affairs insurance reported no differences in rates of CAM use. Overall, no discernable trends were observed to suggest that CAM use among this sample was associated with service access.en
dc.format.extent174871 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.en
dc.subjectComplementary and Alternative Medicineen
dc.subjectBipolar Disorderen
dc.subjectService Accessen
dc.subjectBarriers to Treatmenten
dc.subjectHealth Care Deliveryen
dc.titleAccess to Conventional Mental Health and Medical Care Among Users of Complementary and Alternative Medicine With Bipolar Disorderen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Work
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden
dc.contributor.affiliationumBrian Perronen
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren
dc.identifier.pmid19363387
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/62077/1/Access.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/NMD.0b013e31819dc16a
dc.owningcollnameSocial Work, School of (SSW)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.