Show simple item record

Administrator Perceptions of Political Behavior During Planned Organizational Change.

dc.contributor.authorLy, Geisceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-15T15:09:24Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2009-05-15T15:09:24Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/62218
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to better understand community college administrator perceptions of political behavior during planned organizational change. The goals were: 1) To identify political behavior that administrators engaged in to achieve desired organizational outcomes; 2) To examine whether the use of political behavior varied across administrative levels; 3) To investigate whether the types of change initiatives led varied across administrative levels; and 4) To explore whether administrators believed they achieved desired outcomes when leading change. Embedded in this study was the assumption that leaders can achieve desired outcomes in a politicized environment by engaging in behavior that effectively initiates and guides change. John Kotter’s (1995) Eight Steps for Leading Change Model and the political perspective served as the conceptual frameworks for this study. A qualitative case study methodology was used and individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 administrators at three Michigan community colleges. Results of administrator perceptions of political behavior were presented in three case studies. Analysis of the data revealed five major findings: 1) Administrators engaged in a myriad of political behavior (e.g., building a compelling case, involving the faculty, sharing information to sell ideas, and discerning others’ personal agendas) when leading change; 2) Five core behaviors were typical of all administrators when leading change: getting buy-in, building relationships, involving others, listening and showing respect, and doing homework/research; 3) The kinds of political behavior used varied across administrative levels; 4) Change initiatives varied across administrative levels; and 5) Administrators believed that they achieved desired outcomes when leading change. Analysis and interpretation of data led to the identification of a concept of “politically perceptive” administrative behavior. Those who were politically perceptive (a) exhibited a high level of awareness of workplace politics, (b) recognized how to manage their relationships with other organizational members in a socio-political environment, and (c) considered timing when taking action. Specific examples illustrating politically perceptive administrative behavior were highlighted and the three spheres (i.e., anticipatory thinking, calculated patience, and role acting) central to being politically perceptive were discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent1409599 bytes
dc.format.extent78055 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCommunity Collegeen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational Changeen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Behavioren_US
dc.subjectPlanned Changeen_US
dc.subjectAdministrative Behavioren_US
dc.subjectInfluence Tacticsen_US
dc.titleAdministrator Perceptions of Political Behavior During Planned Organizational Change.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberAlfred, Richard L.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBastedo, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSpreitzer, Gretchen Marieen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberThor, Linda M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/62218/1/geisce_2.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/62218/2/geisce_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.