Show simple item record

A Canine Model to Assess the Biochemical Stress Response to Laparoscopic and Open Surgery

dc.contributor.authorMarcovich, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Antoinette L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSeifman, Brian D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, J. Stuart, Jr.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-10T19:03:04Z
dc.date.available2009-07-10T19:03:04Z
dc.date.issued2001-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationMarcovich, Robert; Williams, Antoinette L.; Seifman, Brian D.; Wolf, J. Stuart (2001). "A Canine Model to Assess the Biochemical Stress Response to Laparoscopic and Open Surgery." Journal of Endourology 15(10): 1005-1008 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63212>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63212
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11789976&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To develop an animal model to assess the stress response to open and laparoscopic surgery. Such a model would allow objective physiologic assessment of the putative benefits of laparoscopy and provide a framework in which to compare modifications in operative and anesthetic technique that might decrease the stress of surgery. Materials and Methods: Mongrel dogs underwent laparoscopic (N = 12) or open surgical (N = 12) left nephrectomy. In 11 control animals, after induction of anesthesia and line placement, the animal underwent either no intervention (open surgery sham; N = 6) or pneumoperitoneum only (laparoscopic sham; N = 5). Serum glucose and cortisol were measured preoperatively, at skin closure, and at 4, 8, and 24 hours postoperatively. Values at each time point were compared in the laparoscopic and open surgical nephrectomy groups and in each of the two nephrectomy groups and their respective shams. Results: Compared with baseline, there was a sharp rise in serum cortisol at the time of skin closure, with a gradual decline to baseline values by 24 hours, in all experimental animals. Significantly lower serum cortisol concentrations were seen at 4 and 8 hours postoperatively in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group. Cortisol was significantly higher in the open group than in the sham-open group at all time points, whereas cortisol was greater in the laparoscopic group than in the pneumoperitoneum-only group only at the 4-hour time point. No differences were seen in serum glucose between groups. Conclusions: The serum cortisol concentration appears to be a good measure of surgical stress in the canine model. The rapid decline in serum cortisol after laparoscopy compared with open surgery may indicate a lesser degree, or quicker resolution, of surgical stress in the former. Furthermore, the similarity in cortisol curves between laparoscopy and pneumoperitoneum only suggests that surgical stress in laparoscopic surgery may be attributable mainly to the effects of pneumoperitoneum.en_US
dc.format.extent175018 bytes
dc.format.extent2489 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersen_US
dc.titleA Canine Model to Assess the Biochemical Stress Response to Laparoscopic and Open Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid11789976en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63212/1/089277901317203100.pdf
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1089/089277901317203100en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.