Show simple item record

Selection of Patients for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery

dc.contributor.authorWolf, J. Stuart, Jr.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-10T19:14:44Z
dc.date.available2009-07-10T19:14:44Z
dc.date.issued2004-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationWolf, J. Stuart (2004). "Selection of Patients for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery." Journal of Endourology 18(4): 327-332 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63417>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63417
dc.description.abstractEach of the well-established approaches to laparoscopy—standard transperitoneal, standard retroperitoneal, and transperitoneal hand-assisted—has its advantages and disadvantages. In order to maximize efficiency and patient benefit, each approach should be used selectively. This paper offers recommendations for the selective use of the hand-assisted technique, which is particularly useful when intact specimen removal is required, the surgeon has limited experience, the situation is expected to be difficult (e.g., prior surgery, fibrosis, inflammation), or the patient's other medical comorbidities mandate a rapid procedure.en_US
dc.format.extent140775 bytes
dc.format.extent2489 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersen_US
dc.titleSelection of Patients for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid15253781en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63417/1/089277904323056852.pdf
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1089/089277904323056852en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.