Are Women Executives Disadvantaged?
dc.contributor.author | Bharath, Sreedhar T. | |
dc.contributor | Narayanan, M.P. | |
dc.contributor | Seyhun, Hasan Nejat | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-07-23T13:24:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-07-23T13:24:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-07 | |
dc.identifier | 1128 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63452 | |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate gender di®erences in insider trading behavior of senior corporate execu- tives in the U.S. between 1975 and 2008. We ¯nd that, on average, both female and male executives make positive pro¯ts from insider trading. Males, however, earn about twice as much as females and also trade more than females. All these results also hold for the sub-sample of very top executives. The results are consistent with the view that female executives have a disadvantage relative to males in accessing inside information even if they have equal formal status. We are able to rule out gender di®erences in dispositional factors such as overcon¯dence and risk-aversion as sole explanations for our results. | en |
dc.format.extent | 450026 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.subject | insider trading | en |
dc.subject | gender | en |
dc.subject | women | en |
dc.subject | profits | en |
dc.subject | risk aversion | en |
dc.subject | information | en |
dc.subject | overconfidence | en |
dc.subject.classification | Finance | en |
dc.title | Are Women Executives Disadvantaged? | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Ross School of Business | en |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63452/1/1128_bharath.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Business, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.