Show simple item record

Moral Saints Reconsidered.

dc.contributor.authorCarbonell, Vanessaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-03T14:43:36Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2009-09-03T14:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63675
dc.description.abstractSome people do far more than morality requires: consider the doctor who travels to a remote or dangerous area to treat the sick. I offer an account of what these “moral saints” look like and argue that their behavior influences the moral obligations faced by the rest of us. According to Susan Wolf’s prominent account, moral saints are necessarily unattractive—dull-witted, bland, obsessive—and thus unworthy as personal ideals. I argue that this view renders saints self-defeating and relies on an unfounded moralization of nonmoral character traits. I then show that a distinction between two types of moral motivation bears on whether moral saints appear unattractive. An agent can be motivated directly by the features that make an act morally right (rightness de re), or instead by some abstract notion of “morality” itself (rightness de dicto). Moral saints appear unattractive only when we make the mistake of assuming they must be motivated by the abstract notion at the expense of the right-making features. I then argue that moral saints ratchet-up our moral obligations by providing the rest of us with a crucial sort of evidence about what it is like to perform morally extraordinary actions, and by extension obligatory actions. Moral obligation is at its core a matter of what we can reasonably demand of one another. One cannot be obligated to perform an action that it would be reasonable to believe is an unbearable sacrifice. Moral saints generate evidence about how much sacrifice is involved in performing actions at the boundaries of obligation. I argue that in the context of moral obligation, a “sacrifice” is a gross loss of well-being, defined agent-neutrally. As our stock of evidence expands, justified ignorance is reduced, thus removing a defeater of obligations. In seeing that actions with a high degree of sacrifice are not unbearably burdensome, we infer that actions with significantly lower degrees of sacrifice are even less burdensome. This knowledge makes those lesser actions obligatory.en_US
dc.format.extent1326511 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMoral Saintsen_US
dc.subjectMoral Obligationen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectSacrificeen_US
dc.titleMoral Saints Reconsidered.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePhilosophyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberAnderson, Elizabeth S.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDarwall, Stephen Leicesteren_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLavaque-Manty, Mika T.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRailton, Peter A.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63675/1/vcar_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.