Show simple item record

Talking About Patients: Nurses' Language Use During Hand-offs.

dc.contributor.authorFord, Yvonne Barthelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-03T14:45:03Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2009-09-03T14:45:03Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63698
dc.description.abstractMiscommunication during end of shift hand-offs between hospital nurses has been implicated as a source of errors in patient care, yet little research evaluates the structure of language during communication in an attempt to understand potential communication errors. Although the functions and meaning of hand-offs for nurses has previously been examined, there is little information about the current state of the structure and language of hand-offs. This research begins to fill that gap in by using genre analysis of transcripts of 43 end-of-shift hand-offs between nurses at four hospitals in the Midwestern United States. Two analytic techniques common in linguistics research were carried out: a move analysis to determine the structure of the hand-offs, and corpus analysis to identify the lexical and grammatical features used by nurses during hand-offs. In addition, two methods used for hand-offs (audio-taped and face-to-face) were compared. Findings from the analyses demonstrated that hand-offs were structured as (a) Introducing the Patient; (b) Relating the Shift's Events; (c) Looking Ahead; and (d) Wrapping Up. Further, analysis identified specific vocabulary and grammatical features upon which nurses rely as well as temporal components of nurses’ language. The comparison of hand-off methods supports earlier findings that audio-taped hand-offs take less time than face-to-face hand-offs, but also identified that audio-taped hand-offs contain significantly fewer indicators of non-literal and interactive communication than face-to-face hand-offs. Findings suggest that opportunities exist within the hand-off process to enhance patient safety in the areas of medication reconciliation, fall risk, pain management, and identification of goals and outcomes for patient care.en_US
dc.format.extent601321 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectHand-offsen_US
dc.subjectGenre Analysisen_US
dc.subjectHand-off Methodsen_US
dc.subjectLanguageen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectNurses' Communicationen_US
dc.titleTalking About Patients: Nurses' Language Use During Hand-offs.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNursingen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRedman, Richard W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSampson, Deborah A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHinshaw, Ada Sueen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKeenan, Gail M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSwales, John Malcolmen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63698/1/yford_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.