Show simple item record

A Developmental Examination of the Conceptual Structure of Animal, Artifact, and Human Social Categories. and Human Social Categories.

dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Marjorieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-03T14:49:46Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2009-09-03T14:49:46Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63768
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines how the ontological status that people attribute to categories varies by domain, age, and cultural context. The first four studies examined whether categories of animals, artifacts, and people are represented as objectively-defined natural kinds, or alternately, as subjective conventionalized groupings. Participants included children (ages 5, 7, 10, and 17) drawn from two cultural contexts. Results demonstrated that abstract domain-specific ontological beliefs emerge early in development; in each age-group, children represented animal categories as natural kinds, but artifact categories as more conventionalized. For human social categories, beliefs about naturalness and conventionality were predicted by interactions between the type of category (i.e., gender vs. race), cultural context, and age. Younger children, in both communities, viewed gender as a natural kind, but race categories as more conventionalized. The concepts of older children were found to vary by cultural context. Older children from an ethnically-homogeneous and socially-conservative environment viewed both types of social categories as natural kinds, whereas children from a more diverse environment viewed social categorization as flexible and subjective. Control conditions confirmed that domain effects in beliefs about category naturalness could not be attributed to perceptual features of the stimuli, category knowledge, category salience, or linguistic properties of the task. The fifth study extended these findings to younger children. This work documented that three- and four- year-olds also conceptualize animal species and gender categories as natural kinds, but artifact and race categories as more subjective and flexible. The sixth study documented that the effects of age and cultural context on representations of social categories also extend to children’s beliefs about how social categories influence individual behavior. Overall, results from this dissertation suggest that abstract beliefs about ontology are incorporated into children’s categories from at least the age of three, as well as that the development of social categorization involves complex interactions between intuitive biases and cultural input. Implications for the origins of social categories and theories of conceptual development are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent390138 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectConceptual Developmenten_US
dc.titleA Developmental Examination of the Conceptual Structure of Animal, Artifact, and Human Social Categories. and Human Social Categories.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGelman, Susan A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEvans, Evelyn Margareten_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKitayama, Shinobuen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMeek, Barbra A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWellman, Henry M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63768/1/rhodesma_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.