Show simple item record

A Day in the Life of African American and European American College Students: Daily Affective Experience and Perceptions of Climate at a Predominantly White Institution.

dc.contributor.authorBirk, Nancy Adairen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-03T14:54:20Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2009-09-03T14:54:20Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/63834
dc.description.abstractIn the context of the under-representation of African Americans in higher education and the lawsuits targeting affirmative action policies in college admissions, the purpose of this study was to examine the daily affective experiences of African American and European American students at a predominantly White institution, exploring the activities to which they devote their time, the people with whom they interact, and the emotions accompanying these experiences, contrasting this with their perceptions of campus racial climate. A sample of 268 students participated in the study, completing the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM), an episodic measure of daily affective experience (Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, & Stone, 2004a), and a global assessment of campus climate. Several key findings emerged from this research. On the global measure, African Americans expressed unfavorable views of the campus climate, but no race differences emerged regarding their daily affective experiences on the DRM. Women reported positive scores on the global measure, but greater negativity in daily experiences on the DRM. Interactions with others of a different race produced more negativity than when the partner was of the same race. Differences in time allocation were few by race, but more plentiful by gender. Women spent more time than men in academic activities and in goal-oriented activities. Men reported more time than women to different-race interactions and to activities with a tangible benefit. This study highlighted the importance of careful consideration of measurement in assessing the experiences and attitudes of college students. Because it does not draw upon direct experience, global measurements of climate may introduce bias into data that can lead to errors in interpretation and in policy. The findings from this research are not intended to discourage the use of global measurements per se, but rather to promote greater attention to the potential for bias often found with global instruments and to encourage the combination of episodic and global measures wherever feasible. The results of this study provide a more comprehensive picture of the ways in which college students experience the campus.en_US
dc.format.extent1820861 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCampus Racial Climate and Diversityen_US
dc.subjectDay Reconstruction Methoden_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.subjectCollege Studentsen_US
dc.titleA Day in the Life of African American and European American College Students: Daily Affective Experience and Perceptions of Climate at a Predominantly White Institution.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKing, Patricia M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCarter, Deborah F.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCortina, Kai Schnabelen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSchwarz, Norbert W.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAfrican-American Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63834/1/nbirk_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.