Show simple item record

Direct observation of safety belt use in Michigan: Fall 2003.

dc.contributor.authorEby, David W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVivoda, Jonathon M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSpradlin, H. K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T17:47:10Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2009-09-17T17:47:10Z
dc.date.issued2003-11
dc.identifier71544 A27en_US
dc.identifier.otherUMTRI-2003-40en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64048
dc.description.abstractA direct observation survey of safety belt use in Michigan was conducted in the fall of 2003. In this study, 11,723 occupants traveling in four vehicle types (passenger cars, sport-utility vehicles, vans/minivans, and pickup trucks) were surveyed between August 28 and September 10, 2003. Belt use was estimated for all commercial/noncommercial vehicle types combined (the statewide safety belt use rate) and separately for each vehicle type. Within and across each vehicle type, belt use by age, sex, road type, day of week, time of day, and seating position were calculated. Statewide belt use was 84.8 percent. This rate represents the highest level of statewide safety belt use ever observed in Michigan. A comparison with the highest safety belt use rate observed before the introduction of primary enforcement shows that the current rate reflects a 14.7 percentage point increase. Belt use was 86.8 percent for passenger cars, 85.4 percent for sport-utility vehicles, 86.3 percent for vans/minivans, and 77.8 percent for pickup trucks. For all vehicle types combined, belt use was higher for females than for males, and higher for drivers than for passengers. In general, belt use was high during the morning and evening rush hours. Belt use did not vary systematically by day of week. Belt use was lowest among 16-to-29 year olds, and highest among the 60-and-older age group. Survey results suggest that the implementation of primary enforcement safety belt use laws and the accompanying enforcement and public information and education efforts have been effective in maintaining and continuing to increase safety belt use in Michigan.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMichigan Office of Highway Safety Planning, Lansingen_US
dc.format.extent59en_US
dc.format.extent213806 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.subject.otherSafety Belt Usageen_US
dc.subject.otherAtmospheric Conditionsen_US
dc.subject.otherObservationen_US
dc.subject.otherDayen_US
dc.subject.otherTime of Dayen_US
dc.subject.otherSamplingen_US
dc.subject.otherRear-Seat Passengersen_US
dc.subject.otherFront-Seat Passengersen_US
dc.subject.otherMandatory Child Restraint Usageen_US
dc.subject.otherAgeen_US
dc.subject.otherMandatory Safety Belt Usageen_US
dc.subject.otherPickup Trucksen_US
dc.subject.otherChild Restraint Usageen_US
dc.subject.otherSmall Buses/ Vansen_US
dc.subject.otherAutomobiles by Size, Weighten_US
dc.subject.otherTime Seriesen_US
dc.titleDirect observation of safety belt use in Michigan: Fall 2003.en_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64048/1/71544_A27.pdf
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.