Show simple item record

Cluster analysis of immunohistochemical markers in leiomyosarcoma delineates specific anatomic and gender subgroups

dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Jason C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Dafydd G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLucas, David R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-02T16:55:29Z
dc.date.available2010-10-05T18:27:29Zen_US
dc.date.issued2009-09-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationCarvalho, Jason C.; Thomas, Dafydd G.; Lucas, David R. (2009). "Cluster analysis of immunohistochemical markers in leiomyosarcoma delineates specific anatomic and gender subgroups." Cancer 115(18): 4186-4195. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64095>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64095
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) can be categorized into uterine, retroperitoneal, nonretroperitoneal soft tissue, cutaneous, visceral, and osseous anatomic subtypes. The differential expression of smooth muscle markers, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Wilms tumor-1 protein (WT1) by anatomic subtype and gender was explored. METHODS: A total of 78 LMS comprised of 30 uterine and 48 nonuterine tumors were studied. Nonuterine tumors were comprised of 17 soft tissue, 16 retroperitoneal, 7 cutaneous, 5 visceral, and 3 osseous subtypes. Immunohistochemical staining intensity on tissue microarray slides was scored as 0, 1+, or 2+, and cluster analysis was performed on the data. RESULTS: Smooth muscle actin was the most sensitive antibody (95%), followed by muscle-specific actin (91%), calponin (88%), desmin (73%), caldesmon (66%), and myosin (64%). Caldesmon and myosin were usually coexpressed, and were highest in retroperitoneal tumors (94%). There was no discernable correlation noted between histologic differentiation and smooth muscle marker expression. ER was much more common in women, with the highest frequencies noted in female retroperitoneal (86%) and uterine (63%) tumors. Nuclear WT1 was expressed in 11% of all tumors, and was limited to ER-positive uterine and female retroperitoneal tumors. Cluster analysis segregated 4 groups, most notably 1 driven by ER and PR, with the vast majority being uterine and female retroperitoneal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Smooth muscle markers demonstrated variable sensitivities in LMS, with a tendency for anatomic subtypes to segregate based on expression patterns of these markers. ER defined a subgroup of uterine and female retroperitoneal tumors, and WT1 was limited to such tumors, suggesting a common line of differentiation as well as potential therapeutic targets. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent323422 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleCluster analysis of immunohistochemical markers in leiomyosarcoma delineates specific anatomic and gender subgroupsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 763-4095 ; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, 2G332 UH, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0054en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19626649en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64095/1/24486_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.24486en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.