Show simple item record

What do we really know about fiscal sustainability in the EU? A panel data diagnostic

dc.contributor.authorRault, Christopheen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso, Antonioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-17T17:00:35Z
dc.date.available2009-11-17T17:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2007-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherRePEc:wdi:papers:2007-893en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64361en_US
dc.description.abstractWe assess the sustainability of public finances in the EU15 over the period 1970-2006 using stationarity and cointegration analysis. Specifically, we use panel unit root tests of the first and second generation allowing in some cases for structural breaks. We also apply modern panel cointegration techniques developed by Pedroni (1999, 2004), generalized by Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre (2006) and Westerlund and Edgerton (2007), to a structural long-run equation between general government expenditures and revenues. While estimations point to fiscal sustainability being an issue in some countries, fiscal policy was sustainable both for the EU15 panel set, and within sub-periods (1970-1991 and 1992-2006)en_US
dc.format.extent394138 bytes
dc.format.extent1802 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.relation.ispartofserieswp893en_US
dc.subjectIntertemporal Budget Constraint, Fiscal Sustainability, EU, Panel Unit Root, Panel Cointegrationen_US
dc.subject.otherC23, E62, H62, H63en_US
dc.titleWhat do we really know about fiscal sustainability in the EU? A panel data diagnosticen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumWilliam Davidson Instituteen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64361/1/wp893.pdf
dc.contributor.authoremailchrault@hotmail.comen_US
dc.owningcollnameWilliam Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.