Is There Electoral Cycles in Globalization Process? Evidence From 78 Democratic Countries, 1975-2006
dc.contributor.author | Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-17T17:02:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-11-17T17:02:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-08-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | RePEc:wdi:papers:2008-931 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64400 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | I investigate whether timing of the elections impact globalization process or not in democratic countries across the globe. In other words, do elections slowdown globalization process? The theoretical underpinning is that, globalization process lead to economic and social hardships in short run but benefit the economy in the long run. The motto behind slowing down globalization process before elections is that it leads to polarization of voters and thus negatively affects the incumbent government. I make use of Axel Dreherís comprehensive globalization index as proxy for overall globalization process; economic globalization index for economic globalization policies and restrictions index as proxy for removal of trade and financial restrictions. I then construct ëinstrumental electoral cycleí to capture the scheduled and midterm election cycle. Using cross-sectional time series data for 78 democratic countries for the period 1975 ñ 2006, I find that scheduled elections are associated with slow down in all the three forms of globalization process, whereas midterm elections are not. Replacing all three Dreherís indices with our modified indices does not alter the results. I also find that slow down in globalization process is responsive to the propinquity to a scheduled election year. Meaning, as incumbent government nears the scheduled elections, globalization process keeps slowing down, while this is exactly opposite during the early years of incumbent government in office. These results suggest that elections generate ìelectoral globalization cycleî in democratic countries. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 352278 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1802 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | wp931 | en_US |
dc.subject | Globalization; Election Cycles | en_US |
dc.subject.other | D72 | en_US |
dc.title | Is There Electoral Cycles in Globalization Process? Evidence From 78 Democratic Countries, 1975-2006 | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | William Davidson Institute | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64400/1/wp931.pdf | |
dc.contributor.authoremail | kc_dcm@yahoo.co.in | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Papers |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.