Show simple item record

Does inconvenience explain low take-up? Evidence from unemployment insurance

dc.contributor.authorEbenstein, Avrahamen_US
dc.contributor.authorStange, Kevinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-05T15:12:52Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:43Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationEbenstein, Avraham; Stange, Kevin (2010). "Does inconvenience explain low take-up? Evidence from unemployment insurance." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29(1): 111-136. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64570>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0276-8739en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6688en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64570
dc.description.abstractApplication inconvenience is one popular explanation for why many individuals do not receive the social benefits for which they are eligible. Applications take time and some individuals may decide that the financial benefits do not outweigh these time costs. This paper investigates this explanation using cross-state variation in administrative changes that made applying for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits substantially more convenient over the past decade. We find that the introduction of phone- and Internet-based claiming did not have an appreciable impact on overall UI take-up, nor did it lead to a shift toward recipients that are higher income or likely to be receiving the maximum benefit amount. These findings are inconsistent with a time- and transaction-cost explanation for low take-up, since remote UI claiming is less time intensive. This suggests that reducing application barriers alone may not be an effective tool for increasing program participation. © 2010 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.en_US
dc.format.extent274978 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherBusiness, Finance & Managementen_US
dc.titleDoes inconvenience explain low take-up? Evidence from unemployment insuranceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumRobert Wood Johnson Scholar in Health Policy Research, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLecturer, Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalemen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64570/1/20481_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pam.20481en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Policy Analysis and Managementen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.