Private Places - Private Shame: Women's Genital Body Image and Sexual Health.
dc.contributor.author | Zielinski, Ruth E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-07T16:21:52Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2010-01-07T16:21:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64608 | |
dc.description.abstract | Body image dissatisfaction is prevalent among women, affecting many components of their sexual health. The increase in female genital cosmetic surgery indicates that women may be experiencing dissatisfaction with even those parts of their body considered to be private – their genitals. Research has been constrained by lack of a reliable and valid instrument to measure genital body image. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between genital body image, global body image, and sexual health while psychometrically testing a previously developed instrument – The Genital Self Image Scale (GSIS). Lower scores on the GSIS indicate more genital body image dissatisfaction. Four diverse groups were utilized: young, nulliparous women (N = 192), women post childbirth (N = 56), women with pelvic organ prolapse (N = 47) and older women without prolapse (N = 45). Content validity was determined using a panel of five experts (three gynecologic surgeons and two sex therapists) resulting in a Content Validity Index of .79. Through item reduction and content validity testing the GSIS was reduced to 20 items and renamed the GSIS-20. Factor analysis was performed using principal component analysis with oblique rotation revealing four factors, identified as Genital Confidence, Appeal, Function and Comfort. Internal consistency for the GSIS-20 was satisfactory across samples (.79 - .89) as was test-retest reliability (r = .883). There was a positive correlation between the GSIS-20 and sexual function (r = .330 - .416) for all groups except women post childbirth (r = .050). In all groups there was a positive correlation between GSIS-20 scores and global body image (.412 - .503). Women with prolapse had significantly lower GSIS-20 scores (t = 2.34, p< .05) than women in the control group. Women who indicated an interest in genital cosmetic surgery had significantly lower GSIS-20 scores than women who did not (t = 5.53, p < .01). Reliability and validity of the GSIS-20 was supported across diverse samples of women. In this study pelvic organ prolapse negatively affected genital body image and genital body image dissatisfaction negatively affected women’s sexual health. Implications for clinicians and researchers are discussed. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1427112 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1373 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Genital Body Image | en_US |
dc.subject | Women's Sexual Health | en_US |
dc.subject | Body Image | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychometric Instrument Validation | en_US |
dc.title | Private Places - Private Shame: Women's Genital Body Image and Sexual Health. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Nursing | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Low, Lisa Kane | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Sampselle, Carolyn M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Miller, Janis Miriam | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Vahratian, Anjel M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Ward, Lucretia M. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Nursing | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64608/1/ruthcnm_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.