Show simple item record

Private Places - Private Shame: Women's Genital Body Image and Sexual Health.

dc.contributor.authorZielinski, Ruth E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-07T16:21:52Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2010-01-07T16:21:52Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitted2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64608
dc.description.abstractBody image dissatisfaction is prevalent among women, affecting many components of their sexual health. The increase in female genital cosmetic surgery indicates that women may be experiencing dissatisfaction with even those parts of their body considered to be private – their genitals. Research has been constrained by lack of a reliable and valid instrument to measure genital body image. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between genital body image, global body image, and sexual health while psychometrically testing a previously developed instrument – The Genital Self Image Scale (GSIS). Lower scores on the GSIS indicate more genital body image dissatisfaction. Four diverse groups were utilized: young, nulliparous women (N = 192), women post childbirth (N = 56), women with pelvic organ prolapse (N = 47) and older women without prolapse (N = 45). Content validity was determined using a panel of five experts (three gynecologic surgeons and two sex therapists) resulting in a Content Validity Index of .79. Through item reduction and content validity testing the GSIS was reduced to 20 items and renamed the GSIS-20. Factor analysis was performed using principal component analysis with oblique rotation revealing four factors, identified as Genital Confidence, Appeal, Function and Comfort. Internal consistency for the GSIS-20 was satisfactory across samples (.79 - .89) as was test-retest reliability (r = .883). There was a positive correlation between the GSIS-20 and sexual function (r = .330 - .416) for all groups except women post childbirth (r = .050). In all groups there was a positive correlation between GSIS-20 scores and global body image (.412 - .503). Women with prolapse had significantly lower GSIS-20 scores (t = 2.34, p< .05) than women in the control group. Women who indicated an interest in genital cosmetic surgery had significantly lower GSIS-20 scores than women who did not (t = 5.53, p < .01). Reliability and validity of the GSIS-20 was supported across diverse samples of women. In this study pelvic organ prolapse negatively affected genital body image and genital body image dissatisfaction negatively affected women’s sexual health. Implications for clinicians and researchers are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent1427112 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGenital Body Imageen_US
dc.subjectWomen's Sexual Healthen_US
dc.subjectBody Imageen_US
dc.subjectPsychometric Instrument Validationen_US
dc.titlePrivate Places - Private Shame: Women's Genital Body Image and Sexual Health.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNursingen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLow, Lisa Kaneen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSampselle, Carolyn M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMiller, Janis Miriamen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberVahratian, Anjel M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWard, Lucretia M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64608/1/ruthcnm_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.