Show simple item record

Bayesian Predictive Inference for Three Topics in Survey Samples.

dc.contributor.authorChen, Qixuanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-07T16:30:56Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2010-01-07T16:30:56Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64741
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I study three problems in survey samples: inference for finite population quantities in unequal probability sampling, variable selection for multiply imputed data, and the application of the multiple imputation method to the problem of detection limits. In survey samples, design-based estimators are often used for inference about finite population quantities when sample sizes are large. However, design-based inference relies on asymptotic assumptions; mean square error can be very large and nominal confidence interval coverage relatively poor when the sample is small. When design information is available to modelers, it can be used to improve the efficiency of the estimators. In Chapters II and III, I provide Bayesian model-based estimators for finite population proportions and quantiles in unequal probability sampling settings by fitting the survey outcomes on the penalized splines of the selection probabilities. Simulation studies show that the robust Bayesian estimator for proportions is more efficient and its 95% CI provides better confidence coverage with shorter average width than the Hajek estimator or the generalized regression estimator. The Bayesian estimators for quantiles also outperform the design-based estimators, with smaller mean squared errors and shorter average width of 95% CIs. When sparse data are selected into samples, the Bayesian estimators yield better confidence coverage. The second part of the research is motivated by two statistical issues connected with the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study which employs a complex survey design. In Chapter IV, I propose a “combine then select” variable selection method which calculates combined p-values using the multiple imputation combining rule and then selects variables based on the combined p-values in each step of the selection. I show through simulations and the dioxin study data that the “combine then select” method is less likely to incorrectly select variables into the model than competing methods currently used in epidemiological studies. In Chapter V, I employ a proper multiple imputation approach to impute the serum dioxin concentrations for those below the limit of detection. I then use the complete imputed data to predict the age- and sex- specific percentiles of serum dioxin concentrations among the U.S. population.en_US
dc.format.extent739645 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBayesian Inferenceen_US
dc.subjectLimit of Detectionen_US
dc.subjectMultiple Imputationen_US
dc.subjectSample Surveysen_US
dc.subjectSpline Modelsen_US
dc.subjectUnequal Probability Samplingen_US
dc.titleBayesian Predictive Inference for Three Topics in Survey Samples.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiostatisticsen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberElliott, Michael R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLittle, Roderick J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGarabrant, David H.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLepkowski, James M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64741/1/qixuan_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.