Show simple item record

The effects of dominant overstory and soil on the densities of worm populations in the forests of Colonial Point.

dc.contributor.authorPalm, Laura
dc.coverage.spatialColonial Point Hardwoodsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-20T14:54:55Z
dc.date.available2010-01-20T14:54:55Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64876
dc.descriptionGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the factors that affect worm distribution in northern Michigan forests, specifically within Colonial Point. The variables in consideration are dominant tree species, comparing hardwood and conifer, soil composition, comparing clay and sand, soil Ph, and leaf litter mass. The densities of worms in clay soil were significantly higher than in sandy soil. The densities were also consistently higher in the hardwood areas than in the conifer areas, however, there was no significant difference. There was no correlation between mass of the leaf litter and worm densities. Soil texture was found to be the primary determinant for worm densities.en_US
dc.format.extent113955 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.subject.classificationNorthern Hardwoodsen_US
dc.subject.otherLUMBRICUSen_US
dc.titleThe effects of dominant overstory and soil on the densities of worm populations in the forests of Colonial Point.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64876/1/Palm_Laura_2009.pdf
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.