Show simple item record

Racial differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with early stage bladder cancer

dc.contributor.authorHollenbeck, Brent K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Rodney L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYe, Zaojunen_US
dc.contributor.authorHollingsworth, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Cheryl T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBirkmeyer, John D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-02T15:31:09Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:44Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationHollenbeck, Brent K.; Dunn, Rodney L.; Ye, Zaojun; Hollingsworth, John M.; Lee, Cheryl T.; Birkmeyer, John D. (2010). "Racial differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with early stage bladder cancer." Cancer 116(1): 50-56. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64913>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64913
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Black patients are at greater of risk of death from bladder cancer than white patients. Potential explanations for this disparity include a more aggressive phenotype and delays in diagnosis resulting in higher stage disease. Alternatively, black patients may receive a lower quality of care, which may explain this difference. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for the years from 1992 through 2002, the authors identified patients with early stage bladder cancer. Multivariate models were fitted to measure relations between race and mortality, adjusting for differences in patients and treatment intensity. Next, shared-frailty proportional hazards models were fitted to evaluate whether the disparity was explained by differences in the quality of care provided. RESULTS: Compared with white patients (n = 14,271), black patients (n = 342) were more likely to undergo restaging resection (12% vs 6.5%; P < .01) and urine cytologic evaluation (36.8% vs 29.7%; P < .01), yet they received fewer endoscopic evaluations (4 vs 5; P < .01). The use of aggressive therapies (cystectomy, systemic chemotherapy, radiation) was found to be similar among black patients and white patients (12% vs 10.2%, respectively; P = .31). Although black patients had a greater risk of death compared with white patients (hazards ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07-1.42), this risk was attenuated only modestly after adjusting for differences in treatment intensity and provider effects (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.42). CONCLUSIONS: Although differences in initial treatment were evident, they did not appear to be systematic and had unclear clinical significance. Whereas black patients are at greater risk of death, this disparity did not appear to be caused by differences in the intensity or quality of care provided. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.en_US
dc.format.extent151086 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleRacial differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with early stage bladder canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; The Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Fax: (734) 232-2400 ; Department of Urology, 1032B Michigan House, 2301 Commonwealth Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0330en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19877112en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64913/1/24701_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.24701en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.