Show simple item record

Semiparametric Modeling of Longitudinal Measurements and Time-to-Event Data–A Two-Stage Regression Calibration Approach

dc.contributor.authorYe, Wenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Xihongen_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Jeremy M. G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:03:20Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:03:20Z
dc.date.issued2008-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationYe, Wen; Lin, Xihong; Taylor, Jeremy M. G. (2008). "Semiparametric Modeling of Longitudinal Measurements and Time-to-Event Data–A Two-Stage Regression Calibration Approach." Biometrics 64(4): 1238-1246. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65518>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-341Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1541-0420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65518
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18261160&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this article we investigate regression calibration methods to jointly model longitudinal and survival data using a semiparametric longitudinal model and a proportional hazards model. In the longitudinal model, a biomarker is assumed to follow a semiparametric mixed model where covariate effects are modeled parametrically and subject-specific time profiles are modeled nonparametrially using a population smoothing spline and subject-specific random stochastic processes. The Cox model is assumed for survival data by including both the current measure and the rate of change of the underlying longitudinal trajectories as covariates, as motivated by a prostate cancer study application. We develop a two-stage semiparametric regression calibration (RC) method. Two variations of the RC method are considered, risk set regression calibration and a computationally simpler ordinary regression calibration. Simulation results show that the two-stage RC approach performs well in practice and effectively corrects the bias from the naive method. We apply the proposed methods to the analysis of a dataset for evaluating the effects of the longitudinal biomarker PSA on the recurrence of prostate cancer.en_US
dc.format.extent184220 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights©2008 International Biometric Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherJoint Modelingen_US
dc.subject.otherLongitudinal Dataen_US
dc.subject.otherSemiparametric Mixed Modelsen_US
dc.subject.otherSmoothing Splinesen_US
dc.subject.otherSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.titleSemiparametric Modeling of Longitudinal Measurements and Time-to-Event Data–A Two-Stage Regression Calibration Approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18261160en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65518/1/j.1541-0420.2007.00983.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00983.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiometricsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbelson, R. P. and Prentice, D. A. ( 1997 ). Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses. Psychological Methods 2, 315 – 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreslow, N. E. and Lin, X. ( 1995 ). Bias correction in generalised linear mixed models with a single component of dispersion. Biometrika 82, 81 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, E. R., Ibrahim, J. G., and DeGruttola, V. ( 2005 ). A flexible B-spline model for multiple longitudinal biomarkers and survival. Biometrics 61, 64 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBycott, P. and Taylor, J. ( 1998 ). A comparison of smoothing techniques for CD4 data measured with error in a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model. Statistics in Medicine 17, 2061 – 2077.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll, R. J., Ruppert, D., Stefanski, L. A., and Crainiceanu, C. M. ( 2006 ). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective, 2nd edition. London : Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDafni, U. G. and Tsiatis, A. A. ( 1998 ). Evaluating surrogate markers of clinical outcome when measured with error. Biometrics 54, 1445 – 1462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaucett, C. L. and Thomas, D. C. ( 1996 ). Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: A Gibbs sampling approach. Statistics in Medicine 15, 1663 – 1685.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, P. J. and Silverman, B. W. ( 1994 ). Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A Roughness Penalty Approach. London: Chapman & Hall Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaw, N. J., Taylor, J. M. G., and Sandler, H. ( 2002 ). The joint modeling of a longitudinal disease progression marker and the failure time process in the presence of cure. Biostatistics (Oxford) 3, 547 – 563.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePauler, D. K. and Finkelstein, D. M. ( 2002 ). Predicting time to prostate cancer recurrence based on joint models for non-linear longitudinal biomarkers and event time outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 21, 3897 – 3911.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentice, R. L. ( 1982 ). Covariate measurement errors and parameter estimation in a failure time regression model (Corr: V71 p219). Biometrika 69, 331 – 342.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSartor, C. I., Strawderman, M. H., Lin, X.-H., Kish, K. E., McLaughlin, P. W., and Sandler, H. M. ( 1997 ). Rate of PSA rise predicts metastatic versus local recurrence after definitive radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiology Oncology, Biology, Physics 38, 941 – 947.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, J. M., Yu, M., and Sandler, H. M. ( 2005 ). Individualized predictions of disease progression following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23, 816 – 825.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsiatis, A. A. and Davidian, M. ( 2004 ). Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: An overview. Statistica Sinica 14, 809 – 834.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsiatis, A. A., DeGruttola, V., and Wulfsohn, M. S. ( 1995 ). Modeling the relationship of survival to longitudinal data measured with error. Applications to survival and CD4 counts in patients with AIDS. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 27 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWahba, G. ( 1978 ). Improper priors, spline smoothing and the problem of guarding against model errors in regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Methodological 40, 364 – 372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, Y. and Taylor, J. M. G. ( 2001 ). Jointly modeling longitudinal and event time data with application to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 895 – 905.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWulfsohn, M. S. and Tsiatis, A. A. ( 1997 ). A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. Biometrics 53, 330 – 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXie, S. X., Wang, C. Y., and Prentice, R. L. ( 2001 ). A risk set calibration method for failure time regression by using a covariate reliability sample. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology 63, 855 – 870.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXu, J. and Zeger, S. L. ( 2001 ). The evaluation of multiple surrogate endpoints. Biometrics 57, 81 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYu, M., Law, N. J., Taylor, J. M. G., and Sandler, H. M. ( 2004 ). Joint longitudinal-survival-cure models and their application to prostate cancer. Statistica Sinica 14, 835 – 862.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang, D., Lin, X., Raz, J., and Sowers, M. ( 1998 ). Semiparametric stochastic mixed models for longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, 710 – 719.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.