View Item 

Show simple item record

How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups

dc.contributor.authorDoukas, D. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFetters, Michael D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoyne, James C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCullough, L. B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:06:10Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:06:10Z
dc.date.issued2000-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationDoukas, DJ; Fetters, MD; Coyne, JC; McCullough, LB (2000). "How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups." Clinical Genetics 58(3): 169-176. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65567>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-9163en_US
dc.identifier.issn1399-0004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65567
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11076038&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent82044 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMunksgaard International Publishersen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsMunksgaard 2000en_US
dc.subject.otherBioethicsen_US
dc.subject.otherDecision-makingen_US
dc.subject.otherGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.otherMedical Ethicsen_US
dc.subject.otherPreventionen_US
dc.subject.otherProstate Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherScreeningen_US
dc.subject.otherValuesen_US
dc.titleHow men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groupsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeneticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Family Practice and Community Medicine, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy Baylor College of Medicine Houston, TX, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid11076038en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65567/1/j.1399-0004.2000.580303.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580303.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Geneticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrÖnberg H, Isaacs SD, Smith JR et al. Characteristics of prostate cancer in families potentially linked to the hereditary prostate cancer 1 (HPC1) locus. J Am Med Assoc 1997 : 278 : 1251 1255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibbs M, Stanford JL, McIndoe RA et al. Evidence for a rare prostate cancer-susceptibility locus at chromosome 1p36. Am J Hum Gen 1999 : 64 ( 3 ): 776 787.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDamber JE. Hereditary prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1999 : 33 ( 203 ): 25 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEeles RA. Genetic predisposition to prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 1999 : 2 ( 1 ): 9 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLange EM, Chen H, Brierley K et al. Linkage analysis of 153 prostate cancer families over a 30-cM region containing the putative susceptibility locus HPCX. Clin Can Res 1999 : 5 ( 12 ): 4013 4020.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNarod S. Genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1999 : 1423 ( 1 ): F1 F13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu ET. The uncoupling of race and cancer genetics. Cancer 1998 : 83 ( 8 ): 1765 1769.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElkman P. Genetic and environmental factors in prostate cancer genesis: identifying high-risk cohorts. Eur Urol 1999 : 35 ( 5–6 ): 362 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBratt O, Kristoffersson U, Lundgren R, Olsson H. Sons of men with prostate cancer: their attitudes regarding possible inheritance of prostate cancer, screening, and genetic testing. Urology 1997 : 50 ( 3 ): 360 365.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiesfeldt S, Jones SM, Cohn W et al. Men's attitudes regarding genetic testing for hereditary prostate cancer risk. Urology 2000 : 55 : 46 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiefenbach MA, Schnoll RA, Miller SM, Brower L. Genetic testing for prostate cancer: willingness and predictors of interest. Cancer Pract 2000 : 8 : 86 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGann PH, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostate cancer. J Am Med Assoc 1995 : 273 : 289 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrahn MD, Mahoney JE, Eckman MH, Trachtenberg J, Pauker SG, Detsky AS. Screening for prostate cancer: a decision analytic view. J Am Med Assoc 1994 : 272 : 773 780.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference14  Canadian Task Force on the periodic Health Examination. Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 3. Secondary prevention of prostate cancer. Can Med Assoc J 1991 : 145 : 413 428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShrader-Bogen CL, Kjellberg JL, McPherson CP, Murray CL. Quality of life and treatment outcomes: prostate carcinoma patients' perspectives after prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Cancer 1997 : 79 : 1977 1986.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCantor SB, Spann SJ, Volk RJ, Cardenas MP, Warren MM. Prostate cancer screening: a decision analysis. J Fam Pract 1995 : 41 ( 1 ): 33 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLitwin MS. Measuring health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. J Uro 1994 : 152 ( (5 Pt 2) ): 1882 1887.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDougherty CJ. Quality-adjusted life years and the ethical values of health care. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994 : 73 ( 1 ): 61 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoukas DJ, Fetters M, Ruffin M, McCullough LB. Ethical considerations in the provision of controversial screening tests. Arch Family Med 1997 : 6 ( 5 ): 486 490.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaffle AE. Trust me, I'm a scientist: will urologists set a lead for geneticists?. Lancet 1996 : 347 : 883 884.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilkie P. Ethical issues in urology: the patient's perspective. Br J Urol 1995 : 76 : 5 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeal DE. Ethical issues and molecular biology in urology. Br J Urol 1995 : 76 : 65 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeauchamp TL & Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fourth Edition. New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Qualitative Research Methods. Series 16. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, 1988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrueger RA. Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan DL & Spanish MT. Focus groups: a new tool for qualitative research. Qual Sociol 1984 : 7 : 253 270.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller WL & Crabtree BF. Clincal research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, 1994 : 340 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrabtree BF & Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, 1992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller WL & Crabtree BF. Primary care research: a multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In: Crabtree BR, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research, vol. 3. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, 1992 : 3 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCreswell JA. Standards of Quality and Verification. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing Among Five Traditions. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, Inc, 1998 : 193 218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCappelli M, Surh L, Humphreys L et al. Psychological and social determinants of women's decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer. Clin Genet 1999 : 55 : 419 430.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCodori AM, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL et al. Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 1999 : 8 : 345 351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerman C, Schwartz MD, Lin TH, Hughes C, Narod S et al. The influence of psychological distress on use of genetic testing for cancer risk. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997 : 65 : 414 420.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBekker H, Modell M, Denniss G et al. Uptake of cystic fibrosis testing in primary care: supply push or demand pull?. Br Med J 1993 : 306 : 1584 1586.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1399-0004.2000.580303.x.pdf
Size:
80.12KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.