Show simple item record

The Mini-Cog as a Screen for Dementia: Validation in a Population-Based Sample

dc.contributor.authorBorson, Sooen_US
dc.contributor.authorScanlan, James M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Peijunen_US
dc.contributor.authorGanguli, Maryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:14:00Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:14:00Z
dc.date.issued2003-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationBorson, Soo; Scanlan, James M.; Chen, Peijun; Ganguli, Mary (2003). "The Mini-Cog as a Screen for Dementia: Validation in a Population-Based Sample." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51(10): 1451-1454. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65703>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65703
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14511167&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo test the Mini-Cog, a brief cognitive screening test, in an epidemiological study of dementia in older Americans. Design : A population-based post hoc examination of the sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Cog for detecting dementia in an existing data set. Setting : The Monongahela Valley in Western Pennsylvania. Participants : A random sample of 1,119 older adults enrolled in the Monongahela Valley Independent Elders Survey (MoVIES). Measurements : The effectiveness of the Mini-Cog in detecting independently diagnosed dementia was compared with that of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a standardized neuropsychological battery. Results : The Mini-Cog, scored by an algorithm as “possibly impaired” or “probably normal,” and the MMSE, at a cutpoint of 25, had similar sensitivity (76% vs 79%) and specificity (89% vs 88%) for dementia, comparable with that achieved using a conventional neuropsychological battery (75% sensitivity, 90% specificity). Conclusion : When applied post hoc to an existing population, the Mini-Cog was as effective in detecting dementia as longer screening and assessment instruments. Its brevity is a distinct advantage when the goal is to improve identification of older adults in a population who may be cognitively impaired. Prior evidence of good performance in a multiethnic community-based sample further supports its validity in the ethnolinguistically diverse populations of the United States in which widely used cognitive screens often fail.en_US
dc.format.extent74463 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights© 2003 by the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherMMSEen_US
dc.subject.otherMoVIESen_US
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherBrief Dementia Screensen_US
dc.titleThe Mini-Cog as a Screen for Dementia: Validation in a Population-Based Sampleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania .en_US
dc.identifier.pmid14511167en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65703/1/j.1532-5415.2003.51465.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51465.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroehlich TE, Robison JT, Inouye SK. Screening for dementia in the outpatient setting. The time and change test. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998 ; 46 : 1506 – 1511.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWind AW, Schellevis FG, Van Staveren G et al. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in diagnosing dementia in general practice. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997 ; 12 : 101 – 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCallahan CM, Hendrie HC, Tierney WM. Documentation and evaluation of cognitive impairment in elderly primary care patients. Ann Intern Med 1995 ; 122 : 422 – 429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor DW, Pollitt PA, Hyde JB et al. Do general practitioners miss dementia in elderly patients? BMJ 1988 ; 297 : 1107 – 1110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStoppe G, Sandholzer H, Staedt J et al. Diagnosis of dementia in primary care : Results of a representative survey in lower Saxony, Germany. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1994 ; 244 : 278 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValcour VG, Masaki KH, Curb D et al. The detection of dementia in the primary care setting. Arch Intern Med 2000 ; 160 : 2963 – 2968.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetersen RC, Stevens JC, Ganguli M et al. Practice parameter. Early detection of dementia : Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2001 ; 56 : 1133 – 1142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBush C, Kozak J, Elmslie T. Screening for cognitive impairment in the elderly. Can Fam Physician 1997 ; 43 : 1763 – 1768.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodaty H, Howarth GC, Mant A et al. General practice and dementia : A national survey of Australian GPs. Med J Aust 1994 ; 160 : 10 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTangalos EG, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ et al. The Mini-Mental State Examination in general medical practice. Clinical utility and acceptance. Mayo Clin Proc 1996 ; 71 : 829 – 837.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorentz WJ, Scanlan JM, Borson S. Brief cognitive screening tests. Can J Psychiatry 2002 ; 47 : 723 – 733.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorson S, Scanlan JM, Brush M et al. The Mini-Cog : A cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000 ; 15 : 1021 – 1027.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScanlan JM, Borson S. The Mini-Cog. Receiver operating characteristics with expert and naive raters. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001 ; 16 : 216 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorson S, Scanlan JM. Mini-Cog : Improving primary care physicians' detection of milder cognitive syndromes. Neurobiol Aging 2002 ; 23 : S158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanguli M, Belle S, Ratcliff G et al. Sensitivity and specificity for dementia of population-based criteria for cognitive impairment : The MoVIES project. J Gerontol 1993 ; 48 : M152 – M161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference16.  American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Ed., Revised. Washington, DC : American Psychiatric Association, 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein MF et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease : Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984 ; 34 : 939 – 944.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC et al. The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1989 ; 39 : 1159 – 1165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL et al. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatr 1982 ; 140 : 566 – 572.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScanlan JM, Brush M, Quijano C et al. Comparing clock tests for dementia screening : Naive judgments vs. formal systems-what is optimal? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002 ; 17 : 14 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoyall DR, Mulroy AR, Chiodo LK et al. Clock drawing is sensitive to executive control. A comparison of six methods. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1999 ; 54B : P328 – P333.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreidl W, Schmidt R, Stronegger WJ et al. Mini-Mental State Examination. Influence of sociodemographic, environmental and behavioral factors, and vascular risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol 1996 ; 49 : 73 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodaty H, Moore CM. The clock drawing test for dementia of the Alzheimer's type : A comparison of three scoring methods in a memory disorders clinic. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry 1997 ; 12 : 619 – 627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStorey JE, Rowland JT, Basic D et al. A comparison of five clock scoring methods using ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001 ; 16 : 394 – 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaton W, Von Korff M, Lin E et al. Population-based care of depression : Effective disease management strategies to decrease prevalence. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1997 ; 19 : 169 – 178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlmeida OP, Almeida SA. Short versions of the geriatric depression scale : A study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999 ; 14 : 858 – 865.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuss DT, Meiran N, Guzman DA et al. Do long tests yield a more accurate diagnosis of dementia than short tests? A comparison of 5 neuropsychological tests. Arch Neurol 1996 ; 53 : 1033 – 1039.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.