Show simple item record

Identifying Older People at Risk of Abuse During Routine Screening Practices

dc.contributor.authorShugarman, Lisa R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFries, Brant E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Rosalie S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorris, John N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:26:34Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:26:34Z
dc.date.issued2003-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationShugarman, Lisa R.; Fries, Brant E.; Wolf, Rosalie S.; Morris, John N. (2003). "Identifying Older People at Risk of Abuse During Routine Screening Practices." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51(1): 24-31. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65922>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65922
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12534841&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo examine the association between various characteristics of community-based older people and a constructed measure of potential elder abuse. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Public community-based long-term care programs in Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 60 and older seeking home and community-based services in Michigan between November 1996 and October 1997 (N = 701). MEASUREMENTS: Data were collected using the Minimum Data Set for Home Care (MDS-HC) assessment. The dependent variable is a constructed measure of potential elder abuse reflecting physical and emotional abuse and neglect. Independent variables include demographic characteristics; diagnoses; behavioral measures; and cognitive, physical, and social functioning. RESULTS: Several measures of social support and social function were strongly associated with the signs of a potentially abusive environment: brittle support (odds ratio (OR) = 3.5, 90% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–8.1), older person feels lonely (OR = 2.4, 90% CI = 1.3–4.5), and older person expresses conflict with family/friends (OR = 2.3, 90% CI = 1.2–4.3). Home care participants' alcohol abuse, psychiatric illness, lack of ease interacting with others, and short-term memory problems were also significantly associated with the signs of potential elder abuse. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the signs of potential elder abuse are associated with a diminishing social network and poor social functioning, although some characteristics of the older person's health are contributing factors. Improved understanding of the link between those characteristics and potential abuse will help healthcare providers, case managers, and others identify older people at high risk of abuse.en_US
dc.format.extent104345 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2003 American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherElder Abuseen_US
dc.subject.otherAgeden_US
dc.subject.otherRisk Factorsen_US
dc.subject.otherFamily Relationsen_US
dc.subject.otherRegression Analysisen_US
dc.titleIdentifying Older People at Risk of Abuse During Routine Screening Practicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute of Gerontology and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumAnn Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother* RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine and Family Studies, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute on Aging at UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, Massachusetts; anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherResearch and Training Institute, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, Boston, Massachusetts.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12534841en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65922/1/j.1601-5215.2002.51005.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51005.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePillemer K, Finkelhor D. The prevalence of elder abuse: A random sample survey. Gerontologist 1988 ; 28 : 51 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2. National Center on Elder Abuse. National Elder Abuse Incidence Study. Washington, DC : American Public Human Services Association, 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePodnieks E. National survey on abuse of the elderly in Canada. J Elder Abuse Neglect 1992 ; 4 : 5 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOgg J. Researching elder abuse in Britain. J Elder Abuse Neglect 1993 ; 5 : 37 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKivelÄ S, KÖngÄs-Saviaro P, Kesti E et al. Abuse in old age: Epidemiological data from Finland. J Elder Abuse Neglect 1992 ; 4 : 1 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacolini RM. Elder abuse policy. Considerations in research and legislation. Behav Sci Law 1995 ; 13 : 349 – 363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall CE, Benton D, Brazier JM. Elder abuse. Using clinical tools to identify clues of mistreatment. Geriatrics 2000 ; 55 : 47 – 50,53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenton D, Marshall C. Elder abuse. Clin Geriatr Med 1991 ; 7 : 831 – 845.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloom JS, Ansell P, Bloom MN. Detecting elder abuse: A guide for physicians. Geriatrics 1989 ; 44 : 40 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLachs MS, Fulmer T. Recognizing elder abuse and neglect. Clin Geriatr Med 1993 ; 9 : 665 – 675.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLachs MS, Williams C, O'Brien S et al. Risk factors for reported elder abuse and neglect: A nine-year observational cohort study. Gerontologist 1997 ; 37 : 469 – 474.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLay T. The flourishing problem of elder abuse in our society. AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs 1994 ; 5 : 507 – 515.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVida S. An update on elder abuse and neglect. Can J Psychiatry 1994 ; 39 : S34 – S40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReis M, Nahmiash D. Validation of the Indicators of Abuse (IOA) screen. Gerontologist 1998 ; 38 : 471 – 480.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHickey T, Douglass RL. Neglect and abuse of older family members: Professionals' perspectives and case experiences. Gerontologist 1981 ; 21 : 171 – 176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips LR. Abuse and neglect of the frail elderly at home: An exploration of theoretical relationships. J Adv Nurs 1983 ; 8 : 379 – 392.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinmetz SK. Duty Bound. Elder Abuse and Family Care. Newbury Park, CA : Sage, 1988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePillemer K, Finkelhor D. Causes of elder abuse: Caregiver stress versus problem relatives. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1989 ; 59 : 179 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAitken L, Griffin G. Gender Issues in Elder Abuse. London : Sage, 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein KF. Elder Abuse and Neglect: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC : National Aging Resource Center on Elder Abuse, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePillemer K, Suitor JJ. Violence and violent feelings: What causes them among family caregivers? J Gerontol 1992 ; 47 : S165 – S172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLachs M, Berkman L, Fulmer T et al. A prospective community-based pilot study of risk factors for the investigation of elder mistreatment. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994 ; 42 : 169 – 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHomer AC, Gilleard C. Abuse of elderly people by their carers. BMJ 1990 ; 301 : 1359 – 1362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference24. National Center on Elder Abuse. Elder Abuse in Domestic Settings. Information Series. Washington, DC : American Public Human Services Association, 1997.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Fries BE, Steel K et al. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: Applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997 ; 45 : 1017 – 1024.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Fries BE, Bernabei R et al. RAI-Home Care (RAI-HC) © Assessment Manual For Version 2.0. Marblehead, MA : Opus Communications, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaveza GJ, Cohen D, Eisdorfer C et al. Severe family violence and Alzheimer's disease: Prevalence and risk factors. Gerontologist 1992 ; 32 : 493 – 497.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHwalek MA, Neale AV, Goodrich CS et al. The association of elder abuse and substance abuse in the Illinois elder abuse system. Gerontologist 1996 ; 36 : 694 – 700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLachs MS, Williams C, O'Brien S et al. Older adults: An 11-year longitudinal study of adult protective service use. Arch Intern Med 1996 ; 156 : 449 – 453.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKosberg JI. Preventing elder abuse: Identification of high risk factors prior to placement decisions. Gerontologist 1988 ; 28 : 43 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyer CB, Pavlik VN, Murphy KP et al. The high prevalence of depression and dementia in elder abuse or neglect. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000 ; 48 : 205 – 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess SA et al. Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: Agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995 ; 50A : M128 – M133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR et al. MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1994 ; 49A : M174 – M182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosmer DWJ, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY : Wiley, 1989.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.