Show simple item record

A Sequential Stratification Method for Estimating the Effect of a Time-Dependent Experimental Treatment in Observational Studies

dc.contributor.authorSchaubel, Douglas E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPort, Friedrich K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:31:37Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2006-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchaubel, Douglas E.; Wolfe, Robert A.; Port, Friedrich K. (2006). "A Sequential Stratification Method for Estimating the Effect of a Time-Dependent Experimental Treatment in Observational Studies." Biometrics 62(3): 910-917. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66010>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-341Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1541-0420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66010
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16984335&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractSurvival analysis is often used to compare experimental and conventional treatments. In observational studies, the therapy may change during follow-up and such crossovers can be summarized by time-dependent covariates. Given the ever-increasing donor organ shortage, higher-risk kidneys from expanded criterion donors (ECD) are being transplanted. Transplant candidates can choose whether to accept an ECD organ (experimental therapy), or to remain on dialysis and wait for a possible non-ECD transplant later (conventional therapy). A three-group time-dependent analysis of such data involves estimating parameters corresponding to two time-dependent indicator covariates representing ECD transplant and non-ECD transplant, each compared to remaining on dialysis on the waitlist. However, the ECD hazard ratio estimated by this time-dependent analysis fails to account for the fact that patients who forego an ECD transplant are not destined to remain on dialysis forever, but could subsequently receive a non-ECD transplant. We propose a novel method of estimating the survival benefit of ECD transplantation relative to conventional therapy (waitlist with possible subsequent non-ECD transplant). Compared to the time-dependent analysis, the proposed method more accurately characterizes the data structure and yields a more direct estimate of the relative outcome with an ECD transplant.en_US
dc.format.extent301471 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2006, The International Biometric Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherCohort Studyen_US
dc.subject.otherFailure Time Dataen_US
dc.subject.otherMatchingen_US
dc.subject.otherProportional Hazards Modelen_US
dc.subject.otherRisk Seten_US
dc.subject.otherSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.titleA Sequential Stratification Method for Estimating the Effect of a Time-Dependent Experimental Treatment in Observational Studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2029, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16984335en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66010/1/j.1541-0420.2006.00527.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00527.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiometricsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, P. K. and Gill, R. D. ( 1982 ). Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Annals of Statistics 10, 1100 – 1120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBilias, Y., Gu, M., and Ying, Z. ( 1997 ). Towards a general asymptotic theory for the Cox model with staggered entry. Annals of Statistics 25, 662 – 682.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, D. R. ( 1972 ). Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, 187 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, D. R. ( 1975 ). Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62, 262 – 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEfron, B. ( 1982 ). The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia : SIAM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin, D. Y., Wei, L. J., Yang, I., and Ying, Z. ( 2000 ). Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 62, 711 – 730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePort, F. K., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Metzger, R. A., Dykstra, D. M., Gillespie, B. W., Young, E. W., Delmonico, F. L., Wynn, J. J., Merion, R. M., Wolfe, R. A., and Held, P. J. ( 2002 ). Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of Kidney donors. Transplantation 74, 1281 – 1286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabbat, C. G., Thorpe, K. E., Russell, J. D., and Churchill, D. N. ( 2000 ). Comparison of mortality risk for dialysis patients and cadaveric first renal transplant recipients in Ontario, Canada. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 11, 917 – 922.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. ( 1983 ). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 41 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWei, L. J., Lin, D. Y., and Weissfeld, L. ( 1989 ). Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modelling marginal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 1065 – 1073.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfe, R. A., Ashby, V. B., Milford, E. L., Ojo, A. O., Ettenger, R. E., Agodoa, L. Y. C., Held, P. J., and Port, F. K. ( 1999 ). Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. New England Journal of Medicine 341, 1725 – 1730.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.