Show simple item record

Factors Associated with Fissure Sealant Delegation: Dentist Characteristics and Office Staffing Patterns

dc.contributor.authorFarghaly, Mahassen M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, Walter Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWoolfolk, Marilyn W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFaja, Barbara Wirthen_US
dc.contributor.authorZiemiecki, Thomas L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPritzel, Susan J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:32:08Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:32:08Z
dc.date.issued1993-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationFarghaly, Mahassen M.; Lang, W. Paul; Woolfolk, Marilyn W.; Faja, Barbara W.; Ziemiecki, Thomas L.; Pritzel, Susan J. (1993). "Factors Associated with Fissure Sealant Delegation: Dentist Characteristics and Office Staffing Patterns." Journal of Public Health Dentistry 53(4): 246-252. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66019>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4006en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-7325en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66019
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8258788&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research was to identify dentist characteristics and dental office staffing patterns related to delegation of sealant applications. Results from a 1989 ma/led survey were used to characterize Michigan general dentists (N =300) who did or did not delegate sealant applications to auxiliaries and to identify factors associated with delegation. Nearly 50 percent of respondents were applying all sealants themselves. In offices that delegated the procedure, the mean proportion of sealants being applied by dentists was 39.9 percent. Registered dental hygienists were applying 51 percent, while registered dental assistants were applying 6.5 percent. Delegating dentists were more knowledgeable about sealant procedures, held more favorable attitudes, treated more young patients, placed more sealants, and were better informed about the legality of delegation according to the state practice act. Logistic regression analysis found that employing a registered dental hygienist was the most significant factor associated with sealant delegation, followed by employing a registered dental assistant. Findings suggest that dental auxiliaries, and particularly registered dental assistants, are underutilized for applying sealants. Approaches to increasing delegation of sealants may include changing dentists' traditional hiring patterns, highlighting the skills of auxiliaries such as the registered dental hygienist (RDH) and the registered dental assistant (RDA), and increasing awareness of legally allowable procedures that RDHs and RDAs can perform.en_US
dc.format.extent1105129 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1993 by the American Association of Public Health Dentistryen_US
dc.subject.otherFissure Sealantsen_US
dc.subject.otherDental Auxiliariesen_US
dc.subject.otherDelivery of Health Care.en_US
dc.titleFactors Associated with Fissure Sealant Delegation: Dentist Characteristics and Office Staffing Patternsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Dentistry University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Mlen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Dentistry University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Mlen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Dental Medicine University of Connecticut Farmington, CTen_US
dc.identifier.pmid8258788en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66019/1/j.1752-7325.1993.tb02712.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1752-7325.1993.tb02712.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Public Health Dentistryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBadner V, Rosenberg D. Dentist use patterns for pit and fissure sealants and topical fluorides. J Dent Educ 1986 ; 50 : 656 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGift HC, Frew RA. Sealants: changing patterns. J Am Dent Assoc 1986 ; 112 : 391 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubenstein LK, Dinius A. Dental sealant usage in Virginia. J Public Health Dent 1986 ; 46 : 147 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen L, Labelle A, Romberg E. The use of pit and fissure sealants in private practice: a national survey. J Public Health Dent 1988 ; 48 : 26 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen L, Romberg E, LaBelle A. The influence of dental practice characteristics on pit and fissure sealant use: a national survey. J Dent Pract Admin 1988 ; 53 : 125 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapko MK. Time to adoption of an innovation by dentists in private practice: sealant utilization. ] Public Health Dent 1991 ; 51 : 144 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen L, Romberg E, LaBelle A. Pit and fissure sealant use in private practice: influence of state practice acts. Am J Public Health 1988 ; 78 : 316 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown W, Charbeneau G. Consensus summary of the conference. In : Conference on pit and fissure sealants: why their limited usage ? Chicago, IL : American Dental Association, 1981.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaine RC, Dennen T. A survey of private dental practitioners' utilization of dental sealants in Washington State J Dent Child 1986 ; 53 : 337 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGonzalez CD, Frazier PJ, Messer LB. Sealant use by general practitioners: a Minnesota survey. J Dent Child 1991 ; 58 : 38 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapko MK, Milgrom P, Bergner M, Conrad D, Skalabrin N. Delegation of expanded functions to dental assistants and hyeienists Am J Public Health 1985 ; 75 : 61 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTommasone DW. Duty delegation. Dent Clan North Am 1974 ; 18 : 829 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMullins MR, Kaplan AL, Mitry DJ, et al. Production-economic effects of delegation and practice size in a private dental office. J Am Dent Assoc 1979 ; 98 : 572 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan AL. Clinical quality and delegation in a private dental office utilizing expanded-function dental auxiliaries. J Public Health Dent 1980 ; 40 : 118 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMullins MR, Kaplan AL, Bader JD, et al. Summary results of the Kentucky dental practice demonstration: a cooperative project with practicing general dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 1983 ; 106 : 817 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBader JD, Kaplan AL, Lange KW, Mullins MR. Production and economic contributions of dental hygienists. J Public Health Dent 1984 ; 44 : 28 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegan JE. The general practitioner's perception on sealant use. In : Conference on pit and fissure sealants: why their limited usage ? Chicago : American Dental Association, 1981 : 41 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorowitz AM, Frazier PJ. Issues in the widespread adoption of pit and fissure sealants. J Public Health Dent 1982 ; 42 : 312 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheirton L. Training and educational needs in pit and fissure sealant application for graduate dental personnel: continuing education and certification courses. J Dent Educ 1984 ; 48 : 66 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference20. State of New Hampshire. The practice of dentistry. Concord : State of New Hampshire, 1989.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference21. Idaho State Board of Dentistry. Regulations of the Idaho State Board of Dentistry. Boise : State of Idaho, 1992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNielsen-Thompson N, Boyer EM. Sealant application frequency, Clin Prev Dent 1988 ; 10 : 17 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGift H. Report of the 1982 preventive dentistry survey. Chicago : American Dental Association Health Foundation, 1984.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy MB, Bernet JK, Chovanec GK, Majerus GJ, Frazier PJ, Newell KJ. Dental hygienists' knowledge, opinions, and use of pit and fissure sealants: a comparison of two states. J Public Health Dent 1987 ; 47 : 121 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilliss T. Application of pit and fissure sealants: long-term effects of a one-day continuing education course. Dent Hyg (Chic) 1986 ; 60 : 300 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan AL, Bader JD, Mullins MR, Lange KW. Measurement of effects of a state dental practice act on potential delegation and production in general dental private practice. J Public Health Dent 1983 ; 43 : 161 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang WP, Farghaly MM, Woolfolk MW, Ziemiecki TL, Faja BW. Educating dentists about fissure sealants: effects on knowledge, attitudes, and use. J Public Health Dent 1991 ; 51 : 164 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealants: attitudes toward and use by dentists in Minnesota. Quintessence Int 1983 ; 4 : 473 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt RJ, Kohout FJ, Beck JD. The use of pit and fissure sealants in private dental practices. J Dent Child 1984 ; 51 : 29 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference30. Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulation. Administrative rules of the Michigan board of dentistry. Lansing : Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulation, 1989.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference31. Norusis/SPSS Inc M. SPSS/PC+. Advanced statistics 4.0 for the IBM PC/XT/AT/ and PS/2. Chicago : SPSS Inc., 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang WP, Farghaly MM, Faja BW, Ziemiecki TL, Woolfolk MW, Dennison JB. The effect of education upon dentists' utilization of fissure sealants. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan, 1989 : 1 – 144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldman H. Dental auxiliaries in a more favorable period for dentistry: numbers, income, and job prospects. Dent Assist 1987 ; 56 : 21 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBader JD, Sams DH, O'Neil EH. Estimates of the effects of a statewide sealant initiative on dentists' knowledge and attitudes. J Public Health Dent 1987 ; 47 : 186 – 92.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.