Show simple item record

Informal Caregiving Time and Costs for Urinary Incontinence in Older Individuals in the United States

dc.contributor.authorLanga, Kenneth M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFultz, Nancy H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaint, Sanjayen_US
dc.contributor.authorKabeto, Mohammed U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHerzog, A. Regulaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:33:13Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:33:13Z
dc.date.issued2002-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationLanga, Kenneth M . ; Fultz, Nancy H . ; Saint, Sanjay; Kabeto, Mohammed U . ; Herzog, A. Regula (2002). "Informal Caregiving Time and Costs for Urinary Incontinence in Older Individuals in the United States." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 50(4): 733-737. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66038>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66038
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11982676&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo obtain nationally representative estimates of the additional time, and related cost, of informal caregiving associated with urinary incontinence in older individuals. DESIGN: Multivariate regression models using data from the 1993 Asset and Health Dynamics Study, a nationally representative survey of people aged 70 and older (N = 7,443). SETTING: Community-dwelling older people. PARTICIPANTS: National population-based sample of community-dwelling older people. MEASUREMENTS: Weekly hours of informal caregiving, and imputed cost of caregiver time, for community-dwelling older people who reported (1) no unintended urine loss, (2) incontinence that did not require the use of absorbent pads, and (3) incontinence that required the use of absorbent pads. RESULTS: Thirteen percent of men and 24% of women reported incontinence. After adjusting for sociodemographics, living situation, and comorbidities, continent men received 7.4 hours per week of care, incontinent men who did not use pads received 11.3 hours, and incontinent men who used pads received 16.6 hours ( P < .001). Women in these groups received 5.9, 7.6, and 10.7 hours ( P < .001), respectively. The additional yearly cost of informal care associated with incontinence was $1,700 and $4,000 for incontinent men who did not and did use pads, respectively, whereas, for women in these groups, the additional yearly cost was $700 and $2,000. Overall, this represents a national annual cost of more than $6 billion for incontinence-related informal care. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity of informal caregiving for older people with incontinence and its associated economic cost are substantial. Future analyses of the costs of incontinence, and the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent or treat incontinence, should consider the significant informal caregiving costs associated with this condition.en_US
dc.format.extent67891 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2002 American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherUrinary Incontinenceen_US
dc.subject.otherOlderen_US
dc.subject.otherDisabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherInformal Caregivingen_US
dc.subject.otherCost of Illnessen_US
dc.titleInformal Caregiving Time and Costs for Urinary Incontinence in Older Individuals in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPatient Safety Enhancement Program, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychology, anden_US
dc.identifier.pmid11982676en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66038/1/j.1532-5415.2002.50170.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50170.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiokno AC, Brock BM, Brown MB et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstitutionalized elderly. J Urol 1986 ; 136 : 1022 – 1025.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohide EA. The prevalence and scope of urinary incontinence. Clin Geriatr Med 1986 ; 2 : 639 – 655.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFultz NH, Herzog AR, Raghunathan T, et al. Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence in older African American and Caucasian women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999 ; 54A : M299 – M303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOuslander J, Palmer M, Rovner B et al. Urinary incontinence in nursing homes: Incidence, remission and associated factors. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993 ; 41 : 1083 – 1089.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOuslander J, Schnelle JF. Incontinence in the nursing home. Ann Intern Med 1995 ; 122 : 438 – 449.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFultz NH, Herzog AR. Self-reported social and emotional impact of urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001 ; 49 : 892 – 899.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaughton MJ, Wyman JF. Quality of life in geriatric patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Am J Med Sci 1997 ; 314 : 219 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLam GW, Foldspang A, Elving LB et al. Social context, social abstention, and problem recognition correlated with adult female urinary incontinence. Dan Med Bull 1992 ; 39 : 565 – 570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnick NM. Geriatric incontinence. Urol Clin North Am 1996 ; 23 : 55 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThom DH, Haan MN, Van Den Eeden SK. Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality. Age Ageing 1997 ; 26 : 367 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner TH, Hu T-W. Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 1998 ; 51 : 355 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOuslander J, Kane R. The costs of urinary incontinence in nursing homes. Med Care 1984 ; 22 : 69 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorrie M, Davidson H. Incontinence in institutions: costs and contributing factors. Can Med Assoc J 1992 ; 147 : 322 – 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWyman JF. The ‘costs’ of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 1997 ; 32 ( Suppl 2 ): 13 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoldo BJ, Hurd MD, Rodgers WL et al. Asset and health dynamics among the oldest old: An overview of the AHEAD Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997 ; 52B : 1 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFultz NH, Herzog AR. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in middle-aged and older women: A survey-based methodological experiment. J Aging Health 2000 ; 12 : 459 – 469.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurgio KL, Matthews KA, Engel BT. Prevalence, incidence and correlates of urinary incontinence in healthy, middle-aged women. J Urol 1991 ; 146 : 1255 – 1259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngberg SJ, McDowell J, Burgio KL et al. Self-care behaviors of older women with urinary incontinence. J Gerontol Nurs 1995 ; 21 : 7 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorgard TM, Rodgers WL. Patterns of in-home care among elderly black and white Americans. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997 ; 52B : 93 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolf DA, Freedman V, Soldo BJ. The division of family labor: Care for elderly parents. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997 ; 52B : 102 – 109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanga K, Chernew M, Kabeto M et al. The explosion in paid home health care in the 1990's: Who received the additional services? Med Care 2001 ; 39 : 147 – 157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandt J, Spencer M, Folstein M. The telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1988 ; 1 : 111 – 117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanga K, Chernew M, Kabeto M, et al. National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia. J Gen Intern Med 2001 ; 16 : 770 – 778.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB et al. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArno PS, Levine C, Memmott MM. The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Aff (Millwood) 1999 ; 18 : 182 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference26. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1998 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. March 2000. Available: http://www.bls.gov/oesnl/oes66011.htm.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuan N, Manning WG, Morris CN et al. A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. J Bus Eco Stat 1983 ; 1 : 115 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKemper P. The use of formal and informal home care by the disabled elderly. Health Serv Res 1992 ; 27 : 421 – 451.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManning WG. The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J Health Econ 1998 ; 17 : 283 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson MA, Werner C. “We had no choice:” A study in familial guilt feelings surrounding nursing home care. J Gerontol Nurs 1982 ; 8 : 641 – 654.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmallegan M. There was nothing else to do: Needs for care before nursing home admission. Gerontologist 1985 ; 25 : 364 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerzog AR, Diokno AC, Fultz NH. Urinary incontinence: Medical and psychosocial aspects. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr 1989 ; 9 : 74 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz S, Kabeto M, Langa K. Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States. JAMA 2000 ; 284 : 3022 – 3027.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnick N. Urinary incontinence. Lancet 1995 ; 346 : 94 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown JS, Vittinghoff E, Wyman JF et al. Urinary incontinence: Does it increase risk for falls and fractures? J Am Geriatr Soc 2000 ; 48 : 721 – 725.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaint S, Lipsky B. Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: Should we? Can we? How? Arch Intern Med 1999 ; 159 : 800 – 808.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.