Show simple item record

Flexible Estimation of Differences in Treatment-Specific Recurrent Event Means in the Presence of a Terminating Event

dc.contributor.authorPan, Qingen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchaubel, Douglas E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:33:16Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:33:16Z
dc.date.issued2009-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationPan, Qing; Schaubel, Douglas E. (2009). "Flexible Estimation of Differences in Treatment-Specific Recurrent Event Means in the Presence of a Terminating Event." Biometrics 65(3): 753-761. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66039>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-341Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1541-0420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66039
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19053997&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we consider the setting where the event of interest can occur repeatedly for the same subject (i.e., a recurrent event; e.g., hospitalization) and may be stopped permanently by a terminating event (e.g., death). Among the different ways to model recurrent/terminal event data, the marginal mean (i.e., averaging over the survival distribution) is of primary interest from a public health or health economics perspective. Often, the difference between treatment-specific recurrent event means will not be constant over time, particularly when treatment-specific differences in survival exist. In such cases, it makes more sense to quantify treatment effect based on the cumulative difference in the recurrent event means, as opposed to the instantaneous difference in the rates. We propose a method that compares treatments by separately estimating the survival probabilities and recurrent event rates given survival, then integrating to get the mean number of events. The proposed method combines an additive model for the conditional recurrent event rate and a proportional hazards model for the terminating event hazard. The treatment effects on survival and on recurrent event rate among survivors are estimated in constructing our measure and explain the mechanism generating the difference under study. The example that motivates this research is the repeated occurrence of hospitalization among kidney transplant recipients, where the effect of expanded criteria donor (ECD) compared to non-ECD kidney transplantation on the mean number of hospitalizations is of interest.en_US
dc.format.extent325624 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights©2009 International Biometric Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherAdditive Rates Modelen_US
dc.subject.otherCompeting Risksen_US
dc.subject.otherMarginal Meanen_US
dc.subject.otherProportional Hazards Modelen_US
dc.subject.otherRate Regressionen_US
dc.subject.otherSemiparametric Modelen_US
dc.titleFlexible Estimation of Differences in Treatment-Specific Recurrent Event Means in the Presence of a Terminating Eventen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19053997en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66039/1/j.1541-0420.2008.01157.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01157.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiometricsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, P. K. and Gill, R. D. ( 1982 ). Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Annals of Statistics 10, 1110 – 1120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook, R. J. and Lawless, J. F. ( 1997 ). Marginal analysis of recurrent events and a terminating event. Statistics in Medicine 16, 911 – 924.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhosh, D. and Lin, D. Y. ( 2000 ). Nonparametric analysis of recurrent events and death. Biometrics 56, 554 – 562.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhosh, D. and Lin, D. Y. ( 2002 ). Marginal regression models for recurrent and terminal event. Statistica. Sinica 12, 663 – 688.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhosh, D. and Lin, D. Y. ( 2003 ). Semiparametric analysis of recurrent events data in the presence of dependent censoring. Biometrics 59, 877 – 885.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang, C. Y. and Wang, M. C. ( 2004 ). Joint modeling and estimation for recurrent event processes and failure time data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, 1153 – 1165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawless, J. F. and Nadeau, C. ( 1995 ). Some simple robust methods for the analysis of recurrent event. Technometrics 37, 158 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi, Q. and Lagakos, S. ( 1997 ). Use of the Wei-Lin-Weissfeld method for the analysis of a recurring and a terminating event. Statistics in Medicine 16, 925 – 940.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin, D. Y. and Yang, Z. ( 1994 ). Semiparametric analysis of the additive risk model. Biometrika 81, 61 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin, D. Y., Wei, L. J., Yang, I., and Ying, Z. ( 2000 ). Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 62, 711 – 730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu, L., Wolfe, R. A., and Huang, X. ( 2004 ). Shared frailty models for recurrent events and a terminal event.  Biometrics 60, 747 – 756.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePepe, M. S. and Cai, J. ( 1993 ). Some graphical displays and marginal regression analyses for recurrent failure times and time-dependent covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 811 – 820.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollard, D. ( 1990 ). Empirical Processes: Theory and Applications. Hayward, California : Institute of Mathematical Statistics.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePort, F. K., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Metzger, R. A., Dykstra, D. M., Gillespie, B. W., Young, E. W., Delmonico, F. L., Wynn, J. J., Merion, R. M., Wolfe, R. A., and Held, P. J. ( 2002 ). Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of donor kidneys. Transplantation 74, 1281 – 1286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentice, R. L., Williams, B., and Peterson, A. V. ( 1981 ). On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 68, 373 – 379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel, D. E. and Cai, J. ( 2005 ). Analysis of clustered recurrent event data with application to hospitalization rates among renal failure patients. Biostatistics 6, 404 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel, D. E., Zeng, D., and Cai, J. ( 2006 ). A semiparametric additive rates model for recurrent event data. Lifetime Data Analysis 12, 389 – 406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSen, P. K. and Singer, J. M. ( 1993 ). Large Sample Methods in Statistics. New York : Chapman and Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A. ( 1996 ). Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. New York : Springer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYe, Y., Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Schaubel, D. E. ( 2007 ). Semiparametric analysis of correlated recurrent and terminal events. Biometrics 63, 78 – 87.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.